 | | Re: Fantastic site —Kevin Maynes
|
| | | (...) <snip> Ok, so why the secrecy?? ;) (25 years ago, 28-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Fantastic site —James Brown
|
| | | | | (...) What secrecy? Cool Lego Site of the Week #20: (URL) (25 years ago, 28-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Fantastic site —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | | (...) I think the "problem" is that there are so many LEGO sites these days that some of the excellent ones get lost. I don't see any secrecy surrounding Eric Brok's site...I fairly certain that LEGO on my Mind has been selected as Cool LEGO Site of (...) (25 years ago, 28-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Fantastic site —Frank Filz
|
| | | | Bram Lambrecht wrote in message <19991128.143520.509...no.com>... (...) Hmm, I wonder if each theme page in Lugnet should have a "top 10" or somesuch (or perhaps just a list of links to all the CLSOTWs for that theme). I think I'm going to examine (...) (25 years ago, 28-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Fantastic site —Gary R. Istok
|
| | | | (...) Maybe a "TOP 10 CLSOTW of the Old Millenium" would make for an interesting new diversion for LUGNET Users, perhaps one that people could vote on. Gary Istok (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Fantastic site —Bram Lambrecht
|
| | | | | (...) Sounds like a great idea to me! I like this idea better than Cool LEGO Site of the Year because more is better[1] :) To make the judging fairer, you could have different categories (with a similar number of sites in each category, of course) (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Fantastic site —Paul Davidson
|
| | | | Of course, since the new millennium doesn't start until 2001, we have a year to discuss it. :) -- Paul Davidson Gary Istok <gistok@umich.edu> wrote in message news:38429E93.49D3F2...ich.edu... (...) <19991128.143520.509...no.com>... (...) has (...) (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | new millenium bugs me —Christopher Lannan
|
| | | | (...) YES! This has really gotten to me of late- how come it's so simple to sit down with someone and explain to them that if you have 10 things, and you count them , then the last one is 10, and if you have 2000 things, and you count them, then the (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: new millenium bugs me —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Dunno about you but *I'm* partying like it's 1999 already, just like what's his name. So ya.... *knowing why* the millenium starts in 2001 is a sign of intelligence. Refusing to party this year anyway is a sign of stupidity (or (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: new millenium bugs me —Frank Buiting
|
| | | | | (...) NO! (see below) (...) It's a matter of what you take as 'the first year'... The first year starts at 0 lasts to 1, second year 1-2, third year 2-3, tenth year 9-10 (since a year is a time-span it starts and ends, that is the thing you (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: new millenium bugs me —Christopher Lannan
|
| | | | | | | (...) with (...) then (...) I just had this argument at work. There is no year zero! At midnight on dec31st is the year 1 BC it became 1 AD (though they didn't think of it as such at the time) so the first decade would look like: (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: new millenium bugs me —Jodi Neal
|
| | | | | | | | (...) years- (...) Ok now I'm real lost here. I was always told that B.C. stood for Before Christ, and A.D. stood for After the Death of Christ. If this is true, then what happened to the 32 years that Christ lived. Are they ever counted. Or were (...) (25 years ago, 5-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: new millenium bugs me —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Years weren't counted in a Christian manner until well after the death of Christ, because early Christians fully expected him to return in their lifetimes. The best estimates say that he was probably born around 4 BC. AD doesn't mean "After (...) (25 years ago, 5-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: new millenium bugs me —Mark Sullivan
|
| | | | | | (...) Unfortunately, YES (see below) (...) with (...) then (...) If it were only so (as a coder... I feel that all things should start at zero). Turns out that long ago there was this monk named Denny the Runt who was commisioned by the Pope to (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: new millenium bugs me —Frank Buiting
|
| | | | | | | In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Mark Sullivan writes: [snipped part about counting to 10] (...) zero). Hmm, that must be it. It must be my programmer's instinct that took over... -Frank (25 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: new millenium bugs me —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | (...) Actually not. Age really does start at 0. You aren't 1 until you have been out of your mother's womb (or the petri dish for those reading this post in the far distant future) for 365 or so days. (25 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: new millenium bugs me —Christopher Lannan
|
| | | | | | (...) There's a difference between being "in your first year" and being "one year old". If you are 30 years old, then that means you have completed 30 years of life, and are in the midst of your 31st year, so the AD counting thing doesn't hold true. (...) (25 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: new millenium bugs me —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | (...) Actually we count aniversaries of our birthday. You really only have one nbirthday, and it's not your "first" birthday... (25 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: new millenium bugs me —Christopher Lannan
|
| | | | | | | (...) we're (...) A good clarification, Frank. I guess by "first one" up above I actually meant the day of your birth, which I guess in common parlance would called your "0th" birthday. I'm feeling feisty today. Chris (25 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: new millenium bugs me —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | This thread is a pedant's dream. Somebody pinch me. (...) not sure what an nbirthday is... I agree that most folks only have one birthday, and ALL folks only have one "actual" birthday. However, there exists a class of people that have more than one (...) (25 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: new millenium bugs me —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | | | Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote in message (...) Why?.. Selçuk (25 years ago, 1-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: new millenium bugs me —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | (...) So that the celebration of the aniversary of their birthday doesn't get lost in the shuffle surrounding the celebration of the aniversary of the nominal birthday of a certain individual who was born some 2000 years ago. A more pragmatic reason (...) (25 years ago, 1-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: new millenium bugs me —Christopher Lannan
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Nope- I got a double whammy- I was born on Jan 6th, then my brother came along two years later on the 19th. So sometimes presents that were for both christmas and the birthday, sometimes b-day presents that were for both of us, and - slightly (...) (25 years ago, 1-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: new millenium bugs me —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I feel your pain every December 28th;-) -John (...) (25 years ago, 1-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: new millenium bugs me —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | (...) Thanks for the reminder that 70% of the world is non-Christian. Sometimes it's easy to forget. ;) Happy Ramadan coming up, Selçuk. best, Lindsay --- Lindsay Frederick Braun (Mr) Department of History Rutgers, the State University of New (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: new millenium bugs me —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | | | Mr L F Braun <braunli1@pilot.msu.edu> wrote in message news:3847779B.88F0A8...msu.edu... (...) Thanks,..:-) Actually, I'm not so much a Muslim, although I'm supposed to be so. I educated to be one, but beginning from the teenage times, it started (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: new millenium bugs me —Tamyra Teed
|
| | | | | | | "Selçuk " wrote: <snip> (...) Well I can explain this one somewhat for you, especially since my birthday is Dec 20th.. I still celebrate it, though sometimes I think I should move it to another month.. Some of the main reasons: You don't get a (...) (25 years ago, 3-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: new millenium bugs me —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | | | Mookie <Mookie1@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message > (...) Thanks for the well written explanation Tamy. I've also received the emailed version..:-) Regards, Selçuk (25 years ago, 6-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: new millenium bugs me —James Brown
|
| | | | (...) Of course, another thing people forget is that the gregorian calander was created several hundred years late and grandfathered a lot. And of course, by the opinions of (most) biblical scholars and historians, the whole thing is off by *at (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
