Subject:
|
Re: Catalogs, Justus and Lego
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Sun, 19 Dec 1999 06:23:31 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
johnneal@uswest/Spamcake/.net
|
Viewed:
|
1532 times
|
| |
|
|
Kevin Loch wrote:
<snip>
> You might even read Brad's latest post as permission to publish current
> instruction scans.
I did. See earlier post.
> I'm surprised that everyone missed that significant point.
I didn't.
> Regardless, it is still my policy to not publish scans of sets in the current
> retail assortment, so I'm the "bad guy" on this issue, not TLC.
Kevin, in light of Brad's latest post, why continue your policy to not publish
current instructions? Just wondering.
-John
>
>
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Catalogs, Justus and Lego
|
| John Neal wrote in message <385C79AE.8C1BD78D@u...st.net>... (...) current (...) publish (...) John, I think that is a bad idea. It seems to me that Brad typed too fast for his own good. I don't think TLG would like us scanning and sharing current (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Cataolgs, Justus and Lego
|
| (...) The pre-1997 (or more specifically not in current retail assortment) restriction on my website is not rediculous and definately _NOT_ imposed on me. I have said this a thousand times privately and publicly. When I started the site, outside of (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
