Subject:
|
Re: Catalogs, Justus and Lego
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Sun, 19 Dec 1999 06:30:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1450 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.dear-lego, Kevin Loch writes:
> You might even read Brad's latest post as permission to publish current
> instruction scans. I'm surprised that everyone missed that significant point.
I see "limited extracts." What are you seeing? Both of these words would
seem to me to have the effect of reducing the scope of what should be
published by anyone but LEGO -- and maybe even including old instructional
booklets.
When I read this, I sort of thought it had maybe killed the whole brickshelf
thing -- it appears that extracts, but not whole instructional booklets, are
what is being given the green light, albeit booklets of any year. Perhaps I
am wrong.
I hope this thing makes sense (I am not myself with this fever)-- and I was
just curious how you saw it, Kevin. Or what is it that informs your opinion?
-- Richard
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Catalogs, Justus and Lego
|
| (...) A complete analysis of "limited extracts" as it applies to brickshelf is an extremely complex matter that need not be discussed here. Suffice to say that the site has been in operation for almost 2 years and "limited extracts" has always been (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Cataolgs, Justus and Lego
|
| (...) The pre-1997 (or more specifically not in current retail assortment) restriction on my website is not rediculous and definately _NOT_ imposed on me. I have said this a thousand times privately and publicly. When I started the site, outside of (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
