Subject:
|
Re: "If it were my toy company..."
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Mon, 13 Dec 1999 23:01:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2225 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.dear-lego, Matthew Miller writes:
> Will Hess <willhess@simflex.com> wrote:
> > If TLG were to go to the expense of reissuing sets they'd have to:
> > 1) begin production of parts that haven't been available for some time
>
> Easier than designing and making new parts.
>
> > 2) print instructions and boxes
>
> Ditto.
>
>
> > 3) sort the parts into poly-bags and the poly-bags into sets
>
> They do this anyway.
>
> > 4) advertise them
>
> Ditto.
>
> > 5) distribute them (S@H, Lego Direct, whatever)
>
> Ditto.
This is one of those Me too letters:
I think so too.
Re-releasing sets would be pretty easy for TLC, and people would love it. And
buy them. (I know I would! I'd start with the Metroliner, then a few Pirate
sets, the big police station...)
-Shiri
In a recent poll, 87% of Shiri's minifigs said they'd rather have the
Metroliner rather than those ugly trains that run in town. 9% thought that the
4559 is the best, while only 2% thought Shiri should buy the 4561...
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
28 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
