To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 796
795  |  797
Subject: 
Re: "If it were my toy company..."
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Mon, 13 Dec 1999 23:56:12 GMT
Reply-To: 
[mattdm@mattdm.]Spamless[org]
Viewed: 
2859 times
  
Nephilim <jthompson@esker.com> wrote:
I wouldn't mind if they modified the sets to make them take advantage of
new elements, as long as the spirit of the original set was preserved.
They could offer a Guarded Inn II that was at least as nifty and neat as
the original.  It might even have more tudor-castle-wall pieces, if LEGO

Oooh, that's a dangerous path. I can just see it now -- Jrized versions of
all our favorite classics.


--
Matthew Miller                      --->                  mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us                       --->             http://quotes-r-us.org/



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: "If it were my toy company..."
 
(...) One reason that LEGO is constantly inventing new pieces is to make sure that as many elements in a LEGO set are patent-protected. The re-released old sets would not have that advantage. I wouldn't mind if they modified the sets to make them (...) (25 years ago, 13-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)

28 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR