To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 4249
4248  |  4250
Subject: 
Re: Dear Lego, please stop doing whatever business thing you did that lead to the 8466 4x4 off-roader
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 19:25:08 GMT
Viewed: 
784 times
  
In lugnet.technic, Steven Lane writes:
> In lugnet.technic, Thomas Stangl writes:
> > Jonathan Wilson wrote:
> > 
> > > That set has been, IMHO, (next to the 8431 Crane Truck re-issue) the best
> > > "really big" technic set in recent years (mindstorms doesnt count as technic)
> > 
> > Others may not agree, since S@H has had to put it on 50% clearance twice to clear
> > out inventory.
> > 
> > I too think it is a great parts set, except...
> > 
> > 
> > > The 8466 has so many good attributes:
> > > 1.a fair few studded beams, including the (exclusive to that set) l-shaped
> > > studded beam (its like 2 1x4 beams joined at right angles)
> > > 2.good specialist parts (like the 4x4 suspension parts for example)
> > > 3.a really cool color (LEGO, please make more parts in Metalic Green)
> > 
> > You're the first person I've seen that likes the pea soup puke green.  There's a
> > reason why those panels don't sell well on Bricklink.  The color is hideous.  It
> > was hideous when it started showing on real cars in the 70s, and it's still
> > hideous today (yet OEMs still occasionally sell a car in that nastly shade).
> > 
> > I would bet that if they had used silver or dark silver in place of the puke
> > green, the set would have sold better.  I know *I* have more puke green panels
> > than I know what to do with, so the spray paint is probably going to have to come
> > out to make them at all useful to me.
> 
> The only thing that would make those parts useful to me would be a Lego
> recycling machine set on beam. (Is it possible to recycle worn Lego?)
> 
> I think people would much sooner have the 8880 which had a much superior 4x4
> mechanism and could be re-released as a classic, but you'd need a poll on
> the official Lego site to confirm this.


<snip>

> 
> Steve

I'd rather have the 8466 over the 8880, even with the green panels--the 8880
is pretty neat, but overly complicated and doesn't have near the suspension
'out of the box' that the 8466 does.  I find that if you want a car, the
8448 'blows the doors' off of 8880--most folks like the 8880 for one sole
reason--the black beams.

I modified the 8466 with the RC unit and motors from 8475 and what a blast
that was.

http://sparky.i989.net/legop4.htm

As soon as I get 2 more 8475 motors, I'm going to add 'em!

In a perfect world, if they were to bring back a large Technic set, for my
money it's the Space Shuttle--by far the best Technic out there, and the
only Technic set that I own that is still together.

Dave K



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Dear Lego, please stop doing whatever business thing you did that lead to the 8466 4x4 off-roader
 
(...) I don't want a car, I never said I did, I only buy sets for the great parts and then build my own thing. I just want to build cool vehicles with driven steer axles. I also have no experience of the 8448, although I know I hate the wheel trims. (...) (23 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)
  Re: Dear Lego, please stop doing whatever business thing you did that lead to the 8466 4x4 off-roader
 
(...) Hi Dave, I really liked what you did with those big cars. RC is the only thing I missed in these cars and to be honest in my own big Lego model cars too. I would love to have my GTcar ((URL) motorised and RC controlled, but I don't know if it (...) (23 years ago, 2-May-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)

Message is in Reply To:
  Dear Lego, please stop doing whatever business thing you did that lead to the 8466 4x4 off-roader
 
(...) The only thing that would make those parts useful to me would be a Lego recycling machine set on beam. (Is it possible to recycle worn Lego?) I think people would much sooner have the 8880 which had a much superior 4x4 mechanism and could be (...) (23 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego)

20 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR