Subject:
|
Re: Dear Lego, please stop doing whatever business thing you did that lead to the 8466 4x4 off-roader
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic, lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Wed, 30 Apr 2003 19:58:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5950 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.technic, David Koudys writes:
> I'd rather have the 8466 over the 8880, even with the green panels--the 8880
> is pretty neat, but overly complicated and doesn't have near the suspension
> 'out of the box' that the 8466 does.
> I find that if you want a car, the 8448 'blows the doors' off of 8880
I don't want a car, I never said I did, I only buy sets for the great parts
and then build my own thing. I just want to build cool vehicles with driven
steer axles. I also have no experience of the 8448, although I know I hate
the wheel trims.
> most folks like the 8880 for one sole reason--the black beams.
>
> I modified the 8466 with the RC unit and motors from 8475 and what a blast
> that was.
I checked with T.J earlier and apparently the 8466 suffers terribly from
slop in the steering linkage, somthing the 8880 doesn't have a problem with.
> In a perfect world, if they were to bring back a large Technic set, for my
> money it's the Space Shuttle--by far the best Technic out there, and the
> only Technic set that I own that is still together.
The shuttle is boring, what can you actually do with it? It has little play
value. The shuttle is the over complex set, and my one suffered because all
it's drive belts slipped.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
20 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|