 | | Re: Lego hostility
|
|
Seems like a lot of hostility over mostly trivial stuff. Not that I disagree with many of the opinions - I just don't see a justification for the vehemence of them. Bruce (...) (23 years ago, 8-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego hostility
|
|
(...) Yeah, tone it down, will ya; you're embarrassing me. And show a little respect-- LD actually reads this stuff! Given all of your cantankerous rants, I'll bet that you are the butt of many jokes around the LD water tank! -John (23 years ago, 8-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego hostility
|
|
(...) Didn't you know? Hop-Frog specializes in Vehemence. No halfway measures for him, no sir! If he decides to feel something, he feels it beyond all reasonable limits, and darned if he isn't going to make sure we all Know His Ire. Chill, dude. :) (...) (23 years ago, 8-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego hostility
|
|
(...) I agree, his tone might have been a bit harsh... there are probably ways to express these feelings and maintain a little more integrity. (...) Well... good. I hope you're right. Maybe some of this dissatisfaction might eventually trickle up (...) (23 years ago, 8-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego hostility
|
|
"Allan Bedford" <apotomeREMOVE-THIS@...vista.net> wrote in message news:GMI9n7.8q1@lugnet.com... (...) I recall a discussion I had with a couple of them towards the beginning of the year when Richard was commenting quite harshly then too. When I (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Hey! That's mine!! Re: Lego hostility
|
|
(...) I was randomly reading some and I came across a msg signed James followed by a bracket sentence starting with who. This is how I've signed my posts for the last 8 months or so. It's probably just a co-incidence, but it freaked me out 'cause I (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego hostility
|
|
(...) I completely agree with you. That was why I prefaced my comments with this statement: +++...+++ (...) +++...+++ (...) Well... I have mixed feelings about this stance. Normally I'm considered a very reasonable person. More than once co-workers (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | foo!
|
|
(...) Which disturbed you then and disturbs you now? C'mon? Reread it, it's not that harsh -- except for maybe the subject line. Disturbs? I think you aren't actually losing any sleep over it, Tim. ;o) Anyway, you know what I owe TLC? Nothing. For (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: foo!
|
|
"richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote in message news:GMIFnJ.37@lugnet.com... (...) Fine, disturb may have been the wrong word to use. But, it still upsets me in the sense that I believe its futile and not the kind of message that will get (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: foo!
|
|
(...) And you think there are ways to get through to them that work? Do tell... (...) Yes, and I have given such thanks over the Guarded Inn, for example. Of course the devil is in the details -- I wasn't quite as pleased to actually receive the (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: foo!
|
|
Hi Richard - "richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote in message news:GMJ85G.9KB@lugnet.com... (...) My thoughts are - just keep persistent at the constructive criticism. Allan mentioned that he was committed to whining and complaining until (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: foo!
|
|
(...) The lugnet.dear-lego group is for posting open letters to TLC, not for debates. Richard's original post in this thread was on-topic to the group. At this point, however, both of you are straying pretty wildly off-topic for the group. Please (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego hostility
|
|
(...) Amen! I'm not posting this message as a "response" to your response but more as a direct post to Lego. I didn't want to say anything but I recently had a nightmare of an experience with the Customer "Service" Representatives at the S & H 800 (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-01, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
