 | | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:FzMtqp.7Ax@lugnet.com... (...) Whoops...sorry Suz! :) -- Tim Courtney - tim@zacktron.com (URL) - Centralized LDraw Resources (URL) - Zacktron Alliance ICQ: 23951114 AIM: TimCourtne (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
(...) c /Todd/Todd and Suzanne/ --Todd (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
"Kyle D. Jackson" <flightdeck@sympatic...mblock.ca> wrote in message news:FzMAw4.L22@lugnet.com... (...) member (...) I would counter you and say that since you have been removed as you admit, you shouldn't be coming in and arguing to the contrary. (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: So where is Brad's answer to the 2001 info?
|
|
(...) demonstrate (...) That [any part in any color] will never happen (at least not with current technology). Well, it could happen if you wanted enough of the part (once they really get this going, it should be possible for someone who is willing (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
(...) G'day Tim, First of all, thanks for your reply. As I imagine you're aware, I wasn't trying to start up any arguments, but was just trying to put another perspective on things, from someone who is both a LEGO hobbyist and a member of LUGNET, (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
"Kyle D. Jackson" <flightdeck@sympatic...mblock.ca> wrote in message news:FzKGvp.5qA@lugnet.com... (...) That's *not* what is happening right now, and its *not* just gripes on our part about how their company is run. Brad Justus came to us last (...) (24 years ago, 20-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Will Lego Learn a lesson?
|
|
(...) I agree on some of your points. I think you could still cycle differnt themes such as 1st year pirates 2nd year ninja 3rd year wild west for an example. This would keep things fresh and at the same time keep introducing sets to established (...) (24 years ago, 20-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
(...) [Warning! Long message!] G'day Tim and other folks, I stumbled upon your post because it appeared on the new-style LUGNET homepage. After reading it, I did a scan of recent postings to this group, and dug up those made by Brad Justus of TLC. I (...) (24 years ago, 20-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Will Lego Learn a lesson?
|
|
(...) something they like, they know they can't wait until they can afford it (which might take months for the 8-12 crowd) because more than likely it will be gone. A short product cycle increases both the urgency of buying new products right away, (...) (24 years ago, 19-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Will Lego Learn a lesson?
|
|
(...) Totally agree with you on this point. All you do when you kill off a theme is fustrate your customers. Why kill off good selling themes like Pirates. Even Wild West sold pretty well and it was way short lived. It looks like Ninja will be (...) (24 years ago, 19-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
(...) Add me to the list. I definitely think it's time for some answers. (...) Key words: MUTUAL BENEFIT. We get what we want (better sets, pieces, consumer service (ala Theme Gallery Pics)...and they get what they want, more money. Not because they (...) (24 years ago, 19-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
(...) Yeah, the bulk is just remodled parts packs to me, not true bulk. (...) Seem's like it to me... (...) TLC may be seeing it, but I don't think that they understand how many people feel this way and one letter TO THEM instead of to the dear lego (...) (24 years ago, 19-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
(...) Exactly right. Progress and cooperation from Lego does not and will not happen until we go outright and state our concerns. It should not have to go this far at all. Lego should be able to recognize out concerns BEFORE we have to tell them (...) (24 years ago, 19-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
"richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote in message news:FzJ048.I8r@lugnet.com... (...) maybe (...) teeny (...) deals (...) discount. Yep - at least the current round of bulk is a disappointment, but it can be looked at as a step in the right (...) (24 years ago, 19-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
I dunno. Bulk has actually been a disappointment to me -- there were maybe three items I wanted in the initial offerings (tiles, foliage, and those teeny windows), the rest was overpriced and pointless to me. I have made many deals of late that were (...) (24 years ago, 19-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Formal Letter to TLC?
|
|
Hey everybody... I've noticed a lot of frustration recently by Lugnuts about TLC's lack of an explanation for 2001 set actions, neglect to do anything about copyrighted stolen images, and lack of communication in general to the community. From the (...) (24 years ago, 19-Aug-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Dear Lego........
|
|
(...) I would second this. Normally I don't just post "me too" posts, but I think that in this case, the more people Brad (and Lego Direct) hear from that feel this way, the better he'll (they'll) understand it. (...) Also disappointing, although (...) (24 years ago, 18-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Dear Lego........
|
|
Dear TLC, Many months ago, when bulk ordering was stil just a dream, Brad Justus contacted us and in his words "made a light at the end of the tunnel". To me that light is still far away. My image of the lego company has actually gone down since you (...) (24 years ago, 18-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego) !
|
| |
| | Re: Will Lego Learn a lesson?
|
|
(...) I believe their capacity is 16,000 - it's probably set by the size of the entrance more than anything else, as that's what matters in an emergency. -- | Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp | Please do not associate my (...) (24 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Picture piracy at www.lego.com: nothing happened at all...
|
|
(...) all! (...) That's funny! Now TLC has removed the wrongnamed stolen Testarossa (which was a Mustang in fact) and has exchanged the model of the month against the next stolen picture: (URL) model with name "top fueler" has been created by Alex (...) (24 years ago, 17-Aug-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
