 | | Re: Please sell the "girls" accessory bag from 3409 seperately
|
|
(...) I would! -Shiri -- I'll be on vacation between July 15th and the end of August... please forgive slow replies to emails/posts. (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Please sell the "girls" accessory bag from 3409 seperately
|
|
I don't know if anyone else has mentioned it, but I was just thinking, it would be REAL nice if they would sell the bag of female heads and wigs from the new soccer set separately. It's already a separate bag. Just throw a LEGO Direct set number on (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego has gotten 'CHEAP'?
|
|
(...) It started in 1997. It is known here as "juniorizing," and everyone here hates it. It is thought it started because kids started to get lazy, and wanted something they could play with sooner than a decent set. We here are hoping it will not go (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
|
|
(...) Not paying attention, that's all. Here is a proof for you: 1. You design better sets than TLC does. 2. I design better sets than you do. 3. Therefore, by transitive closure, I design better sets than TLC. QED :=) (this german keyboard is (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
|
|
Markassius wrote: <snip> (...) I need to chime in on this one: 6474 ROCKS! The reason: It' isn't that juniorized. Their are separate axle plates, not a one piece body like the juniorized sets. It doesn't have the 1x3 doors, which sucks, but the toe (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Lego has gotten 'CHEAP'?
|
|
I has been my experience that TLC, of late, has gotten cheap. I recently bought 6464, among other newer Town sets, and found that TLC no longer, or rarely, uses the 1x3 doors for the vehicles (PartsRef 3821 3822). This is upsetting, as my minifigs (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
|
|
(...) I *didn't* know that. JohnG, GMLTC (you can reach me at gmltc_j1 @ yahoo.com ) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
|
|
(...) Uhhhhhh, me? If I found some laying around for $150 or less MISB, I sure would add to the 5 I have ;-) (...) True - I'd MUCH rather have a ton more grey windows and doors WITH glass (my "spare" 37 windows and 9 doors will be used up in no time (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
|
|
(...) I've got 5 or 6 (I forget, exactly) already. Who needs more than that? Just sell me the doors and windows and wagon plates and slopes in bulk and I'm fine. Sure, a rereleased metroliner at 150 USD would be nice. But I'd rather see better NEW (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Does Lego replace broken parts?
|
|
(...) Assuming you're in the US, try 1-800 GAB LEGO ... if they aren't it, they know the number. Ask for Consumer Affairs. Hope that helps. ++Lar (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
|
|
(...) Yeah, in the first month. Let's see what happens in siz months. See if the bulk ordering demands are still that great. Remember that we had to wait for bulk sales a _long_ time. Everybody got psyched up and started buying as soon as bulk sales (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
|
|
(...) Castle jr. succinctly describes my opinion of the 20 Castle series... (...) Another theme I missed while in college...for the most part...I am happy with the few figs I have, but I dream of a Battrax once in awhile... (...) I am not a train (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
|
|
(...) And bulk orders are doomed to fail, right? That's what TLC probably thought before the advent of Lego Direct -- presently, demand has exceeded all expectations. (...) Why not? Aren't you asserting it as a fact that they SHOULD acknowledge? I (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
|
|
(...) It could be worse...RE-VAMPING old themes... They could turn Space sets into a joke and Town sets into 2 bricks w/ wheels... Worse yet... They could bring back one of the most venerable themes like Castle and incease the price and give you (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
|
|
(...) I think this is exactly why TLC will NOT re-release old themes. Only a few dozen want it. Second reason: Re-releasing old themes would be like admitting defeat. TLC would have to acknowledge that present day themes stink when comparing them to (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
|
|
(...) A thousand times -- YES!!! -- Richard (one of dozens of persons to have expressed this desire previously) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re - Realease Old Themes?
|
|
I think that TLC should Re - release some of the popular older themes I think they would sell very well because most people here missed out on heaps cool sets when they went through there dark age(s). - James Walker (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Idea for new Town set
|
|
I attened the Canada Day fireworks earlier tonight (yikes, its past midnight! Make that yesterday!). I though, hmm, now how could I make this in a Lego town? Here is my idea for a set: "Fireworks Celebration" - A completely non-juniorized fire truck (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jul-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Does Lego replace broken parts?
|
|
1-800-GAB-LEGO ;-) (...) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (24 years ago, 30-Jun-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Does Lego replace broken parts?
|
|
(...) Thanks! I recieved an e-mail yesterday (Thanks Chris!) giving me the number (1800-453-4677) and I spoke to a very nice an courteous lady. The parts that I recently broke (bad heavy object landing on legos incident...) are going to be replaced! (...) (24 years ago, 30-Jun-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
