Subject:
|
Re: Palm Tree Junior
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Mar 2000 19:22:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2339 times
|
| |
|
|
That's a 1x2 plate with HANDLE, not side-clip ;-) Everyone else was talking
about the new 1x2 brick with side clip (horizontal clip, holds things
vertically).
John Neal wrote:
> "Tom Stangl, VFAQman" wrote:
>
> > Uh, WHAT 1x2 plate with side clip?
>
> http://home.att.net/~partsref/images/2540.gif Sorry, I was thinking about
> this guy as opposed to his new juniorized counterpart, the 1x2 brick.
>
> -John
>
> > I've only ever seen 1x1, and you can't
> > make the 1x2 brick with side clip with a 1x1 plate with side clip.
> >
> > John Neal wrote:
> >
> > > Steve Bliss wrote:
> > >
> > > > In lugnet.dear-lego, Richard Franks wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > And that goes for all the POOPs - the 1x2 brick with side clip ...
> > > >
> > > > Strictly speaking, the 1x2 brick with side clip isn't a POOP--you can't
> > > > build it out of other pieces.
> > >
> > > How about two 1x2 plates sandwiching a 1x2 plate with a side clip? Seems
> > > poopy to me...
> > >
> > > -John
> > >
> > > > But it is a juniorized, un-lego-ish
> > > > nightmare. Should have been a 1x2 plate with a side clip.
> > > >
> > > > Steve
> >
> > --
> > Tom Stangl
> > ***http://www.vfaq.com/
> > ***DSM Visual FAQ home
> > ***http://ba.dsm.org/
> > ***SF Bay Area DSMs
--
| Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp
| Please do not associate my personal views with my employer
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Palm Tree Junior
|
| (...) (URL) Sorry, I was thinking about this guy as opposed to his new juniorized counterpart, the 1x2 brick. -John (...) (25 years ago, 9-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
