Subject:
|
Re: Palm Tree Junior
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Tue, 7 Mar 2000 20:50:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1487 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.dear-lego, Shiri Dori writes:
> In lugnet.dear-lego, Steve Bliss writes:
> > In lugnet.dear-lego, brickhead wrote:
> >
> > > Yeah LEGO,
> > >
> > > those juniorized palm trees are disgusting. My 4- and 6 year old children
> > > don't like them either. Think of it. I don't EVER will buy another set that
> > > includes those trees. NEVER.
> >
> > Good plan. We bought one set bearing a mono-palm, <set:5976>, but we
> > never will again! EVER.
>
> Yep, me either. For a while I was planning on buying the big one <set:5986>
> but after getting the 5976 I decided against it. The palm tree was a major
> reason why.
It's kind of sad, actually... Having palm trees actually used to be a reason TO
buy the sets... now it's a reason AGAINST buying them. I used to justify
my set buying with the fact that sets had a palm tree in them. That's one
reason I've justified buying 12 Oasis Ambushes, but not buying a single set
that has the uni-palm piece. :(
DaveE
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Palm Tree Junior
|
| (...) Yep, me either. For a while I was planning on buying the big one <set:5986> but after getting the 5976 I decided against it. The palm tree was a major reason why. -Shiri (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
