Subject:
|
Re: Palm Tree Junior
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Tue, 7 Mar 2000 14:34:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1529 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.dear-lego, Steve Bliss writes:
> In lugnet.dear-lego, brickhead wrote:
>
> > Yeah LEGO,
> >
> > those juniorized palm trees are disgusting. My 4- and 6 year old children
> > don't like them either. Think of it. I don't EVER will buy another set that
> > includes those trees. NEVER.
>
> Good plan. We bought one set bearing a mono-palm, <set:5976>, but we
> never will again! EVER.
Yep, me either. For a while I was planning on buying the big one <set:5986>
but after getting the 5976 I decided against it. The palm tree was a major
reason why.
-Shiri
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Palm Tree Junior
|
| (...) I bought a second 5976, on clearance, and *threw out* 2 of 3 pieces of the new palm tree. (I kept the 2x2 round plate.) This is the only Lego element I've ever discarded so. I even keep broken pieces around. James (URL) getting paid for this (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | Re: Palm Tree Junior
|
| (...) It's kind of sad, actually... Having palm trees actually used to be a reason TO buy the sets... now it's a reason AGAINST buying them. I used to justify my set buying with the fact that sets had a palm tree in them. That's one reason I've (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
