To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 158
157  |  159
Subject: 
Re: New Service Packs for 1999..
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Wed, 27 Jan 1999 20:28:20 GMT
Viewed: 
1445 times
  
"James Brown" <galliard@shades-of-night.com> writes:

David Blomberg writes:
It would be useful to post addresses
and names of individuals that we should
write to.

Agreed.  I've been following the "we should write letters" thread, and (while I
come down on the non-form letters side) I agree that it is a good thing.
However, most people don't have the slightest clue of where to send such a
letter.  Could someone post the different address that might be appropriate for
such letters?  Most companies have more than one that are appropriate, and very
often, especially in large companies, the one that is given out most frequently
is the least useful, as it is guaranteed to be read first (and probably second
and third) by people whose sole job is filtering mail.

If anyone has more effective addresses that they can distribute (without
violating stated or implied agreements about the distribution of same) then by
all means, do!  Perhaps you can arrange something with Todd to provide for •                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
anonymity in posting them, if that's a consideration.  Todd?
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


If you mean assistance in concealing the identity of a poster who wants to post
the name and/or address of a TLG employee, then the answer is No Way; anonymous
postings are against the Terms of Use of the lugnet.com newsgroups.

If you mean assistance in forwarding a colleciton of anonymous or non-anonymous
postings to someone at TLG, while keeping the TLG employee's identity private,
then it's possible that something could perhaps be arranged if an appropriate
TLG employee were to step forward and declare willingness to accept such a
collection of messages and deliver them to the appropriate person/people at
TLG.  On the other hand, if the most appropriate person/people at TLG really do
truly care about what AFOLs have to say in the first place, then I'm sure that
one way or another, they will find and read the messages in this ng and in some
filtered subset of RTL.  That is to say, with several thousand TLG employees
worldwide, wouldn't it be surprsing if there weren't already a few people
collecting and forwarding posts to managers and co-workers?

--Todd



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: New Service Packs for 1999..
 
(...) by (...) post (...) anonymous (...) Absolutely! I was unclear. Even disregarding the Terms of Use (which I'm not), I have personal moral objections to the forwarding of private information, anonymous or otherwise. What I had meant to state is (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New Service Packs for 1999..
 
(...) Agreed. I've been following the "we should write letters" thread, and (while I come down on the non-form letters side) I agree that it is a good thing. However, most people don't have the slightest clue of where to send such a letter. Could (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)

27 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR