 | | Re: LEGO Database Software
|
|
(...) you're describing a feature that we've been thinking of for Peeron.com. Unfortunately, I don't currently have the time to implement it, but it is planned :) Sorry I can't be of more help :/ Dan (21 years ago, 28-Feb-03, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | LEGO Database Software
|
|
I've been searching for a software program that will let me track my LEGO parts inventory and compare my inventory to the available set parts lists and show me what set I can build. I checked out BrikTrak which does let me enter my parts inventory (...) (21 years ago, 28-Feb-03, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron crosses 2000 inventory mark!
|
|
(...) When exactly did the transition to hollow studs occur? This *can* be cleaned up, sorta (see below), although it's time consuming. A parts database that allowed built-in ambiguity of which part a given inventory has might be a better solution. (...) (21 years ago, 27-Feb-03, to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.pirates)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Part Numbering System
|
|
(...) ...snip. Well I consider a common parts numbering system to be totally nessesary. I have spent the last 4 months counting and cataloging my collection. For the most part I have used LDraw number because that was what I had first. I have to (...) (21 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Part Numbering System
|
|
(...) The question has been asked before, I believe it will be asked again. The general reason that a corporation would not cooperate in a situation like is that it would cost them money (ie, they'd have to pay people to spend their time dealing (...) (21 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Part Numbering System
|
|
(...) I agree. Ask the question first, explain the benefit to the community, and hope for the answer we are looking for. It would seem to me that if the information is available on larger parts for public consumption, surely they would not maintain (...) (21 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Part Numbering System
|
|
(...) I asked italy@lego.com for the index number on the sticker sheet in 6970 after I hadn't got reply on this post: (URL) was told (in a very friendly way) that all information regarding discontinued sets has been destroid. (...) billund calling (...) (21 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Part Numbering System
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes: Hi Steve I applaud the efforts you, Dan and Jennifer are putting forward to making this work. This might seem like a silly question - but has anyone asked LEGO for the missing part numbers. As LEGO molds the (...) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Part Numbering System
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote in message ... (...) It's my understanding that Bricklink has been hoping for part number synchronization for a while - there has been a good deal of discussion of it recently and they seem to have given up on the possibility. (...) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposal: New Part Numbering System
|
|
Yay! Best regards, /Tobbe (URL) SPAM when e-mailing) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Proposal: New Part Numbering System
|
|
Hi! I've been talking with Dan and Jennifer Boger tonight, trying to figure out how we can improve the synchroni[s|z]ation between LDraw and Peeron part numbers. And anyone else's part system that wants to play with us, too. :) Basically, there are (...) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.db.brictionary) !!
|
| |
| | Re: New set 10045 - Bridge Elements
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) Interesting how they name this - it's actually 10 studs long, but the lattice section is 2x6x1.2/3, with a 2x2x2/3 section at each end to use for attachment. I hope the part is given the dimensions 2x10x1.2/3 in Ldraw... ROSCO (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jan-03, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular 3L
|
|
(...) Why not 6536 : Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular 2L - Axle/Pin32291 : Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular 2L Double - Axle/Pin+Pin Chris (21 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular 3L
|
|
I have to question calling any of these an "axle joiner". They bear no resemblance in appearance or function to the basic Technic Axle Joiner 6538, which is actually designed to join two axles together rigidly. None of these "axle joiner (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular 3L
|
|
It's also related to 6536 "Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular" and 32291 "Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular Double". How about "Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular Double (Inline)"? --Bill. (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 2 new parts in new racer sets
|
|
(...) I must agree with this...I think the 1 x 2/1 x 4 bracket has also appeared in the <set:10030 Imperial Star Destroyer> in dark gray. The other part you mentioned I believe is totally new...but I could be wrong. There are a few other Racers sets (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | 2 new parts in new racer sets
|
|
Hi all, Here in Denmark some small new racer-sets have been available for a couple of weeks (sets 8358, 8359, 8360). There are some useful new parts: In set 8359 a light grey bracket (like part 2436) - not 1x2/1x4 though, but 1x2/2x2. In set 8358 a (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Another Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular 3L
|
|
(...) (URL)which is clearly related to the Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular 3L (...) (URL)and the confusingly named and oriented Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular (...) (URL)What on Earth should this new one be called? Technic Axle Joiner (...) If (...) (21 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Another Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular 3L
|
|
Reports are that set 8353 contains this piece (URL) is clearly related to the Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular 3L (URL) the confusingly named and oriented Technic Axle Joiner Perpendicular 3 Long (URL) on Earth should this new one be called? (...) (21 years ago, 31-Dec-02, to lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: 24-tooth Technic gear confusion - Part(s) 3648, 3648a, x187
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Lance Hopenwasser writes: [snipped description of the situation] (...) *Eventually*, I'd expect there to be a 3648a and a 3648b. That is, if the other version is ever rendered for LDraw (assuming it hasn't already). In LDraw, when (...) (22 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.brictionary, lugnet.db.inv)
|
