To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.castleOpen lugnet.castle in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Castle / 440
439  |  441
Subject: 
Re: Different Idea over CastleDastville
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.castle
Date: 
Sun, 7 Nov 1999 22:32:18 GMT
Viewed: 
3180 times
  
Mike Stanley wrote:

> Jonathan Wilson <wilsonj@xoommail.com> wrote:
> > I vote for option B because then people do not have to wait because one person is
> > holding up the works for whaever reason. A few rules that I insist on if I do the
> > mpd:
> 
> That you insist on?  How about we all AGREE to some rules?  After
> all, this isn't just YOUR project, right?


Sorry for being rude. I should have said that they are suggestions.

> > 1.no use of parts that do not exist/have never existed in colors you have used
> > them in (in case someone ever tries to build the model or any of the segments)
> 
> I don't think this is valid at all.  One good thing that could come
> out of this is showing off just what we _could_ do if we could get
> the parts in the colors we want.


o.k. then forget that one then.

> > 4.all dat files must be posted to cad.dat.models (unlike a certain set of fire
> > truks in a certain town that has the name of datsville) if you have a really good
> > reason not to post them then I will consider it.
> 
> What the heck does this mean, not the "rule" itself but the pissy
> comments after it?


i am not entirly sure why i put the comments in...

> You backsliding again, JW?  We don't need a pissing contest here
> between CastleDatsville and "a certain town that has the name of
> datsville" do we?



> > 6.no extra meta commands (e.g. rotate commands)
> > 7.mpd files to be used instead of inlining especially with unofficial parts.
> > 8.files may be edited so that the final mpd file has only one copy of various
> > unofficial parts.
> 
> I don't know what most of this means - I'm not an L-Cad pro.
> 
> > I plan to do a gatehouse to get us started. it will be in the style of the
> > gatehouse used in my warwick castle model.
> 
> Sounds like you're already considering this JW's project and not
> that of a group of people.


nope. I am not. I am just going to make a gatehouse, that's all.

> I'm providing the hosting - the only thing I "insist" upon is that
> we come up with a decent way to get me the files I'm supposed to
> host.
> 
> --
> The parts you want and nothing else?
> http://jaba.dtrh.com/ - Just Another Brick Auction
> Why pay eBay? Run your own LEGO auctions for free!
> http://www.guarded-inn.com/bricks/



--
Jonathan Wilson
wilsonj@xoommail.com
http://members.xoom.com/wilsonj/



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Different Idea over CastleDastville
 
(...) That you insist on? How about we all AGREE to some rules? After all, this isn't just YOUR project, right? (...) I don't think this is valid at all. One good thing that could come out of this is showing off just what we _could_ do if we could (...) (27 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)

20 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR