Subject:
|
Re: [CW][OT-FUN] sound tracks (was: Casting Castle World)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Followup-To:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Fri, 18 Feb 2000 17:01:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1307 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Jeff Johnston writes:
> Pawel Nazarewicz wrote:
> >
> > > So, should I put bkgound music on my site, or would that be annoying?
> >
> > If the person viewing can control it, then it may be good for the mood, but
> > if they cannot, forget it;)
>
> Gotta go with Pawel and James on this one! BG music should be controllable by
> the viewer in case they don't *want* music for some reason.
I HIGHLY agree... on an HTML note, I find that you can always tell who's the
newbie web programmer because they often try to use all the cool tricks they
can think of: midi files, animated gifs, java applets, funky frame layouts,
etc... All these are really neat, but if not used well, or if not used
sparingly, they make the page look silly and quite unprofessional. Not to
mention that it takes up download time. If a page has midi, loads of animated
gifs, flashing text, etc., that's the usually surest way of guaranteeing that I
won't go back to the site of my own free will. But if you want to put music on
the page, DEFINITELY make it user controlled-- don't assume they want to hear
anything until they tell you so.
Anyway, that's my $.02
DaveE
(FUT .publish)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: [CW][OT-FUN] sound tracks (was: Casting Castle World)
|
| (...) Gotta go with Pawel and James on this one! BG music should be controllable by the viewer in case they don't *want* music for some reason. (Like they're at work. Of course I would never read LUGNET during slow moments at work. Any posts you see (...) (25 years ago, 18-Feb-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
