 | | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight)
|
|
(...) But, but, Hollywood says that all people in the middle ages were beautiful. That must make it true! James (URL) not an actor, but I play one on TV..." (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight)
|
|
(...) Too true. And in the interest of equality, why don't they make printed muscle-bound males to go with these ambitiously-drawn female figures? How are we supposed to make hulking barbarians? Is this some sort of TLG bias? All in fun, Dave! (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | 6023 box question
|
|
Has anyone noticed that there are two different European boxes for 6023 Maiden's Cart? You can see the variation in the scan I sent to KL.net... (URL) box is the same size as 6016, 6018 boxes, and the other is like a version of a 6035 box I have. (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight)
|
|
Don't forget the Islanders babe who was even topless, save for her strategically placed lei. (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Availability of new castle?
|
|
Is there any rhyme or reason to the availability of the new castle, or is it more or less random, based on orders and distributors and such? I've seen the posts of people who have come across them in the last few days but no where hereabouts seems (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Availability of new castle?
|
|
I got five new Castle sets tonight in Saint Louis. I got 3 Star Wars sets (little ones) as well, although most SW were already sold out - that section had been ransacked, apparently. I've been looking regularly as I do my Christmas shopping and (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Availability of new castle?
|
|
I had to stick the new Castle set under the scan box at TRU in Milwaukee this weekend and just about had a heart attack. $79.99 for 400 some odd BURPs/CRAPs (whatever the ugly one piece parts are)!. Does TLC think kids can't make the walls out of (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Availability of new castle?
|
|
John DiRienzo wrote: <snip most of message> 6095 also is the first set I know of that has printing on (...) Islanders, Ninja, Explorians, Spyrius have printing on the legs, Spyrius had printing on the legs for the robot. I can't think of anything (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Availability of new castle?
|
|
(...) Star Wars has a few 'figs with leg printing too (Tattooine Luke is the only one I can think of off-hand), as does Insectoids. I think UFO might have as well. J (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight)
|
|
Actually, I never saw she was a woman until a few months ago. But I still think that the castle babe is "worse", I don´t know why. --Tobias Kevin Knoot skrev i meddelandet ... (...) girl (...) I (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Availability of new castle?
|
|
(...) Roboforce, Star Wars, and Wild West ("Indian") minifigs also have printing on their legs. Both Spyrius and Islander were introduced in 1994, so I think they share the honor of being first to introduce decorated legs. I suppose it's going to (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Availability of new castle?
|
|
Nephilim wrote in message ... (...) bother (...) I see. If I would open these things I would know, but if its not Castle, then what's the point?! -- Have fun! John The Legos you've been dreaming of... (URL) weird Lego site: (URL) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Scans of new Minifigs
|
|
Does anyone out there have any scans of the Castle minifigs. Even pictures from the instructions on how to build the minifigs is fine (you know, the first part of the instructions that you see)Please email pics if you have them. Thanks, K@RL (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Availability of new castle?
|
|
(...) Heh. See, I'm theme-polyamorous, or something like that (i.e. a theme slut). Castle is one of my main squeezes, though. -- jthompson@esker.com "Float on a river, forever and ever, Emily" (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight)
|
|
(...) Provocative? (...) There was a paradisa babe (or a townie, in any event) with visibly defined sexual characteristics (breasts) printed on her. A yellow torso printed with a red swimsuit-looking top. LEGO's been making figures with visibly (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Availability of new castle?
|
|
(...) However, I do believe that the new castle sets are the first to feature printing on the *waist*! They actually have the belt buckle printed where it's SUPPOSED to be now.... Which means unfortunately if you put a new waist together with an old (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Leo's castle-- number mix up?
|
|
An oddity- I was putting away my instructions for my new 2000 sets when I noticed something VERY bizarre! I usually put my instructions in order, so I was putting my Leo's Castle instructions away-- and thinking all this time that it was 6091, I got (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: A new castle babe!!! (and a weird knight)
|
|
(...) I thought the "red space" was a robe or cloak... Jeff (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Leo's castle-- number mix up?
|
|
Thanks for pointing it out. I kept thinking it was 6098, because thats what the instructions said. I didn't really pay attention to the box. Mismatched numbers. Wonder how long it will take them to figure that out?! If they read Lugnet, like they (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Leo's castle-- number mix up?
|
|
(...) I think I'd "prefer" 6098... The catalog lists it as 6091, as does the box... and I THINK when the 2000 sets were listed on TLC's site it was listed as 6091... but who knows... Maybe they got some sense when they were printing up the (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
