To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.castleOpen lugnet.castle in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Castle / 1073
1072  |  1074
Subject: 
Re: Leo's castle-- number mix up?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.castle
Date: 
Mon, 20 Dec 1999 16:21:49 GMT
Viewed: 
547 times
  
   Thanks for pointing it out.  I kept thinking it was 6098, because thats
what the instructions said.  I didn't really pay attention to the box.
Mismatched numbers.  Wonder how long it will take them to figure that out?!
If they read Lugnet, like they should, they can catch it pretty quick.

--
   Have fun!
   John
The Legos you've been dreaming of...
http://www114.pair.com/ig88/lego
my weird Lego site:
http://www114.pair.com/ig88/
David Eaton wrote in message ...
An oddity-
I was putting away my instructions for my new 2000 sets when I noticed
something VERY bizarre! I usually put my instructions in order, so I was
putting my Leo's Castle instructions away-- and thinking all this time that • it
was 6091, I got ready to put it in its place right next to 6090 (Royal • Knight's
Castle)... when I noticed something... the instructions had the number • 6098! I
did a double take, then thought maybe I had been mistaken about the number • all
along. But sure enough, the box reads 6091, and the instructions read 6098!
Makes me wonder what number they really meant! (since 6098 is higher than • any
other of the new castle sets, and 6091 is less than a couple, despite the • fact
that Leo's Castle IS the largest of the new sets... makes me want to think
that 6098 is the right number!)

In other news, I put King Leo's Castle on the Rock Raiders baseplate just • to
see how it looks-- VERY cool. Gives the castle a rather different feel to • it...

DaveE



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Leo's castle-- number mix up?
 
(...) I think I'd "prefer" 6098... The catalog lists it as 6091, as does the box... and I THINK when the 2000 sets were listed on TLC's site it was listed as 6091... but who knows... Maybe they got some sense when they were printing up the (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
  Re: Leo's castle-- number mix up?
 
(...) Wow. That's *two* errors in the new Castle sets box printing. The other one is on the 6095 Royal Joust, which has the Portuguese name for 'Guarded Treasury' instead of the correct one. Bizarre. I wonder what happened? I wonder if LEGO changed (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)

Message is in Reply To:
  Leo's castle-- number mix up?
 
An oddity- I was putting away my instructions for my new 2000 sets when I noticed something VERY bizarre! I usually put my instructions in order, so I was putting my Leo's Castle instructions away-- and thinking all this time that it was 6091, I got (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)

8 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR