Subject:
|
Re: Leo's castle-- number mix up?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Mon, 20 Dec 1999 17:04:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
304 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, David Eaton writes:
> An oddity-
> I was putting away my instructions for my new 2000 sets when I noticed
> something VERY bizarre! I usually put my instructions in order, so I was
> putting my Leo's Castle instructions away-- and thinking all this time that it
> was 6091, I got ready to put it in its place right next to 6090 (Royal • Knight's
> Castle)... when I noticed something... the instructions had the number 6098! I
> did a double take, then thought maybe I had been mistaken about the number all
> along. But sure enough, the box reads 6091, and the instructions read 6098!
> Makes me wonder what number they really meant! (since 6098 is higher than any
> other of the new castle sets, and 6091 is less than a couple, despite the fact
> that Leo's Castle IS the largest of the new sets... makes me want to think
> that 6098 is the right number!)
>
> In other news, I put King Leo's Castle on the Rock Raiders baseplate just to
> see how it looks-- VERY cool. Gives the castle a rather different feel to • it...
>
> DaveE
Hey there! Good use of a baseplate!!!
I am still waiting for King Leo's Castle to arrive in the south, I was going
to combine it with my two 6090s and various other castle parts (love them
spiral staircases!) and use the 6091 (or 6098, depending on your instructions)
baseplate for the gatehouse, and a 6090 baseplate for the main keep. I have
done some of the work on a Rock Raiders baseplate, but it looks so sinister!
I have a second Rock Raiders baseplate (two total) and four of the Night
Lord's castle that I think will make a nice Evil Knight's castle.
The problem with the Bulls is that they have more siege engines than
invaders. LEGO really needs to make some service packs for Royal Knights and
Bull Invaders (sold separately!) and with NO MORE KINGS!!!!! I have waaaay
too many gold crowns and silver greatswords.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Leo's castle-- number mix up?
|
| Aaron West wrote in message ... (...) that it (...) 6098! I (...) all (...) 6098! (...) any (...) fact (...) to (...) going (...) instructions) (...) have (...) sinister! (...) and (...) I am guessing there will be a mini-fig pack next year, as well (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Leo's castle-- number mix up?
|
| An oddity- I was putting away my instructions for my new 2000 sets when I noticed something VERY bizarre! I usually put my instructions in order, so I was putting my Leo's Castle instructions away-- and thinking all this time that it was 6091, I got (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
