|
 | | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| "Jeroen de Haan" <info@digitalbricks.nl> skrev i meddelandet news:H4v32p.FJw@lugnet.com... (...) Nice picture! It is now my desktop background at work. 2 days and some hours! Do you have more than one computer? I would get itchy not having a (...) (22 years ago, 1-Nov-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
| 
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.185)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering with MegaPov 0.7 (long post)
|
| (...) Thanks! (...) Well, I rendered a model by James Mathis (ICE train) with radiosity and camera-blur and Mega-Pov + POV-Ray 3.1 was SEVEN TIMES FASTER than POV-Ray 3.5! I also liked the overal picture rendered by MegaPov better, a bit softer if (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.185)
|
|
| | Excellent rendering with MegaPov 1.0 !!!
|
| Hi all, Forget my last post about MegaPov 0.7, yesterday MegaPov 1.0 was announced (see: (URL) )! And it is compatible with POV-Ray 3.5. Hopefully it is still as fast as version 0.7. Jeroen (22 years ago, 1-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.185)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering... (need new l3p)
|
| (...) Gotta love the radiosity pics! So the big question now is how close is the next release of l3p? You know, the one that supports all this on the command line with -ib -ie -il and -ci as mentioned in this thread. (URL) can't wait. Don (22 years ago, 20-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.177)
|
|
| |
| 
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.054)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| (...) That is a rendering? Wow. I think the slightly out of focus effect, combined with the "area lights" makes the rendering look very credible. If it's done with (Mega)POV-Ray, I bet the rendering was pretty CPU intensive... Fredrik (22 years ago, 26-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.038)
|
|
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.025)
|
|
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.022)
|
|
| | Re: problem with dark colors using Lgeo
|
| (...) Hi Willy, There are several ways to do this and (sadly) most/all of them means editing the POV-file: 1) You can increase the power of the lights by changing the "color rgb <1,1,1>" to, say, "color rgb <1.5,1.5,1.5>". You can also change one (...) (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.019)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| (...) Adding a focal length won't make a POV rendering look that good, though. The reason it looks so good is because the renderer that rendered it appears to be very very good. I imagine the fact that is illuminated with an area light is in large (...) (22 years ago, 27-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.017)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| "Fredrik Glöckner" <fredrigl@math.uio.no> skrev i meddelandet news:qrdbs67sac0.fsf....uio.no... (...) I dug a bit deeper into the POV manuals, and found it! The '+c' rendering option can be used to continue a rendering that has previously been (...) (22 years ago, 6-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.013)
|
|
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.012)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| (...) My words exactly. It is only the segmented surfaces on the round brick in the foreground that reveals that it is a rendering. - Okay. There is also a revealing lack of ridges between the bricks. (...) Yes. Has POV-Ray implemented rendering (...) (22 years ago, 27-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.008)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| (...) Well, actually I have (1). But I used the +c switch In POV-Ray so I did most of the rendering at night; my wife doesn't like that the computer is on all day. It's a pretty good option because it goes on where you stopped it. Mind you, you have (...) (22 years ago, 1-Nov-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.008)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| (...) All it really needs is some way to adjust things like the reflectivity of the tires-- they're kinda shiny, which shows off the splines, unlike the rendering with Brazil... The only giveaway on the Brazil model I could spot right off was the (...) (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.008)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| Wow... now that's what I'd like to see in my animations. But the render times are just impossible. A 15 second clip would take a month rendering! I guess I'll stay with the standard methods and stop-motion for a while. On another note, returning to (...) (22 years ago, 6-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.008)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering with MegaPov 0.7 (long post)
|
| Hej Jeroen, a BIG thanks to you for this extensive and clear post about how to get 'excelent rendering results' (ERR...) with MegaPov 0.7 but(yes), me is one of those lazy guys... so, how about a comparison between Povray3.5 and MegaPov 0.7 in both (...) (22 years ago, 30-Dec-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.007)
|
|
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.007)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering... (need new l3p)
|
| (...) Yes, I really appreciate that Lars C Hassing contacted the POV-Ray forum for new ideas to improve the renderings. By the way, has anybody tried to combine the "new style" rendering with the edge detection concept in MEGA-POV? Perhaps that (...) (22 years ago, 20-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.006)
|
|
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
| (...) You see, I guess I should somehow now copy/paste this testfile somewhere into a *.pov file made of one of my *.dat files right? Tried it, got errors. I feel stupid, but after seeing all these 'excellent renderings' I say: ME WANNA ME WANNA! (...) (22 years ago, 1-Nov-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
| |
|
excellent, rendering
(score: 4.005)
|
