 | | Re: Weird Logo Issue at L3P Quality Level 3 [DAT]
|
|
(...) Hi Richard, Do not blame Lars. Look at the contents of the 4869.dat file and try to replace this line 1 16 0 0 -52 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 stud.dat by this line 1 16 0 0 -52 1 0 0 0 0 -1 0 1 0 stud.dat Does this solve your problem? Friendly, Damien (22 years ago, 6-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Weird Logo Issue at L3P Quality Level 3
|
|
Hey Y'all: If you render the element 4869.dat with L3PAO quality level 3, as far as I can see you get the logo reversed. Other elements render fine. See: (URL) the aforementioned jet engine insert rendered next to a 2x2 round brick. The logo is (...) (22 years ago, 5-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
|
"travis" wrote... (...) No, I just made a POV file with the objects and the camera for the talented POV artists to play with. They have come up with fantastic settings for colors and lights. And yes, I hope to include some of these in the next L3P. (...) (22 years ago, 5-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
|
i do see what you mean. it seems as if my colors are always a little dark using the lgeo librarys, but the detail makes up for it, and photoshop usually gets it to where i can live with it. -tk "Fredrik Glöckner" <fredrigl@math.uio.no> wrote in (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
|
no, its been renamed the autokickasstweak button. seriously I want a step by step tutorial on this image. I like how the shadows are so dull, the seems are invisible, subtle reflections, depth of field, could I go on and on... hell yeah. I'd pay for (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
|
(...) I don't think I said that. At least it was not my intension. What I meant to say was that the standard colour/surface definitions in L3P / LGEO need some tweaking to get those results. Fredrik (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
|
Beatiful.... So.. Is there a new version of L3P coming up with a "realistic" switch? :) THL (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
|
Fantastic renderings ! Both ! The Brazil 3D-Studio and the POV-Ray. Now the question is: how can we "normal" users (without Silicon graphic equipment ;-) ) make SO NICE renderings ?! For example I'm using ML-Cad, L3PAO, LGEO parts library and (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: LGEO orientation problem
|
|
(...) Depends on what part it is and how it was oriented wrongly. For example, for the 6536 "Crossblock", I added a rotate statement to the very end of the declaration of "lg_6536" in the file "lg_6536.inc" from LGEO. You'll find that the (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: LGEO orientation problem
|
|
how do you add the rotate statement or reposition a piece that is incorrectly oriented? -tk "Fredrik Glöckner" <fredrigl@math.uio.no> wrote in message news:qrdit2u7p7x.fsf....uio.no... (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
|
(...) renderings is to work more on the surface/colour definition within POV-Ray. The one which are the default from LGEO or L3P are probably not the optimal ones. With all due respect to the authors, of course! I don't mean to belittle their work, (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | part swap
|
|
how do you remedy library problems with lgeo? I just noticed that my part 3939 is being rendered as part 3942. Also my part 73435 is rendered 180 degrees off axis. -tk (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
|
what does this mean? Then I ran it through L3P: (...) Does this have something do with the lighting? -tk "Lars C. Hassing" <lch@ccieurope.com> wrote in message news:H1u4vC.793@lugnet.com... (...) to quality. (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Excellent rendering...
|
|
"Trond Hasse Lie" wrote... (...) Yes, truly amazing! But now have a look at what POV can do... ("with a little help from my fiends" :-) I started 3 1/2 years ago but never finished building the 2556 in LDraw (URL) I grabbed the Ferrari by Kenneth (...) (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: lgeo library
|
|
success. thanks for all you guy's help. Now if i could find some tutorials on lighting and camera. check out the side by side comparison that I posted. (URL) (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: lgeo library
|
|
(...) use -lgeo if you want Lgeo parts -l means "use light.dat files" as light sources. (...) See fix in (URL) (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P, an apology (Was: lgeo library)
|
|
(...) Actually I think the problem lies in PovRay. A while ago Brian Ulmer pointed to a PovRay bug-report at (URL) the 3.5 inlcude file colors.inc was reported to be missing a #version 3.5; at the top of the file (after line 9 (#declare (...) (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | L3P, an apology (Was: lgeo library)
|
|
Hi, In my last post I may have given the impression that L3P writes "bad" POV-code that doesn't work. This isn't so of course and it wasn't my intention to give anyone that impression. What I wanted to say was that L3P writes code optimized for (...) (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: lgeo library
|
|
(...) There are some new options in POV-Ray 3.5 that confict with POV-code that L3P writes and is used in the LGEO parts, but there is a solution. Read it here: (URL) isn't it! Jeroen (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: lgeo library
|
|
here are the steps that i'm taking 1. convert model from .dat to .pov with -l 2. load file into POV-Ray 3.5 for windows 3. hit the Ini button 4. use command; +LC:\LDRAW\lgeo 5. hit set but don't render 6. hit run. a file is opened in POV-ray called (...) (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
