Subject:
|
Re: RACHAL Changeover
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 3 Apr 2007 22:43:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3396 times
|
| |
|
|
Tim Gould wrote:
> I think it leaves them alone. Certainly I've never had any troubles with it
> converting one way or the other before. If you edit a Windows text file on a
> UNIX emacs it will show the extra ^R (or whichever is unused on UNIX) which
> suggests to me that it just treats the non-native newline bit as a regular
> character.
Which may or may not be an issue. It's irrelevant if you're just
editing existing lines, but if you add new ones, vi will add them in the
file-native format (CRLF for a DOS file), while emacs will add them in
the machine-native format.
Dan
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: RACHAL Changeover
|
| (...) You have my pity ;) (...) I think it leaves them alone. Certainly I've never had any troubles with it converting one way or the other before. If you edit a Windows text file on a UNIX emacs it will show the extra ^R (or whichever is unused on (...) (18 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
