To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 3084
3083  |  3085
Subject: 
Re: library license
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Tue, 18 May 2004 13:04:38 GMT
Viewed: 
847 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
It seems like if would be a good idea, if the parts library
maintainers set up a poll among the parts authors, to see
which of the appropriate licenses has the strongest support
(counted in number of modelled parts I suppose).

Would it simplify things for part authors who don't care about
the license to declare their parts to be public domain?  Because
I really don't want to be bothered wrestling over a license for
the handful of files I had anything to do with.

Don



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: library license
 
(...) Yes. Except that "public domain" is a concept that doesn't exist outside USA. (...) If you send Steve Bliss an e-mail, where you tell him that he (as LDraw.org Parts Library Head Honcho) is free to choose which license your parts files are (...) (20 years ago, 19-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: library license
 
(...) Good point. Both of them are fine with me. I think I prefer the Attribution-ShareAlike license, if I have to make a choice between the two. It seems like if would be a good idea, if the parts library maintainers set up a poll among the parts (...) (20 years ago, 18-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

27 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR