To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 3081
3080  |  3082
Subject: 
Re: library license
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Tue, 18 May 2004 06:48:44 GMT
Viewed: 
896 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Don Heyse wrote:
   In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
   In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Peter Howkins wrote:
   You have more important things to sort out such as a parts library license.

  1. We are focused on licensing as the first major task after we get

   My opinion is they should be placed in the ‘public domain’,

  1. We are considering PD as one of the alternatives. It has some

I’d also recommend Public Domain, or something really short and simple such as the zlib license. Do you think it does enough to encourage contributions back into the original library?


I know the license has been discussed for a long time, but to add my two cents; I’d really like to see the parts library use a Creative Commons license, specifically the Attibution-ShareAlike license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0/) or the plain old Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/). These have the benefit of being simple and standardized.

Andy



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: library license
 
(...) Good point. Both of them are fine with me. I think I prefer the Attribution-ShareAlike license, if I have to make a choice between the two. It seems like if would be a good idea, if the parts library maintainers set up a poll among the parts (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
  Re: library license
 
(...) The only blurry point I see with those is the clause: "Any of these conditions can be waived if you get permission from the author." Who is the author of the parts library? ROSCO (21 years ago, 18-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  library license
 
(...) I'd also recommend Public Domain, or something really short and simple such as the zlib license. Do you think it does enough to encourage contributions back into the original library? The zlib/libpng License Copyright (c) <year> <copyright (...) (21 years ago, 17-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

27 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR