| |
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Andrew Westrate wrote:
| |
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Don Heyse wrote:
| |
I’d also recommend Public Domain, or something really short and
simple such as the zlib license. Do you think it does enough to
encourage contributions back into the original library?
|
I know the license has been discussed for a long time, but to add my two
cents; I’d really like to see the parts library use a Creative Commons
license, specifically the Attibution-ShareAlike license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0/) or the plain old
Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/). These
have the benefit of being simple and standardized.
|
The only blurry point I see with those is the clause:
“Any of these conditions can be waived if you get permission from the author.”
Who is the author of the parts library?
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: library license
|
| (...) I imagine we would define the author of the Parts Library as LDraw.org? The point for me is, parts authors are submitting their work towards the community effort. It makes much more sense to me that the community organization licenses out the (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: library license
|
| (...) I know the license has been discussed for a long time, but to add my two cents; I'd really like to see the parts library use a Creative Commons license, specifically the Attibution-ShareAlike license ((URL)) or the plain old Attribution (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
