 | | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
Bram, I think the reason we would have a submodel for that submodel is because it is an official submodel. We would inline it because it is stationary; it can't be moved from where it is. Take a look at a scan of the instructions, it might help to (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) The point is if the submodel does not contain *any* moving parts, why make it a seperate model? Though we do have the available space filename-wise, it does seem kinda silly. But still, either way I guess is about the same thing. -Tim Courtney (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) I don't see the point of inlineing any submodels unless they aren't official submodels. If the instructions use a submodel, why inline it? Seems like kind of a waste in making the submodel in the first place... --Bram Bram Lambrecht / o o \ (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:3767a2e5.193694...net.com... (...) Good incentive for people to learn part-making! Modeling the M:Tron line is what got me into doing parts. -John Van (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) But we need to severely minimize the number of incomplete sets. Read Ampi's post. Don't think that we can make anything and everything and put it up there, there must be standards. (...) Yep. (...) No. (...) Read my post on the final file (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) Correct. (...) Good point. I like the readiness system. Should we have it relative to the number of pieces, so you divide the number of parts by the number of parts in the model to get the percentage? Also, you could multiply it by a certain (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) the (...) could (...) Repository. But on (...) errors - (...) large (...) anyways for (...) can strongly (...) Whatever works I guess :) I was thinking of it in a sense that as they are building the model and come across an unmade patterned (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
|
(...) OK. You're going to have some funny-looking models, with all those missing parts. Steve (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
Tim Courtney wrote in message <199906152252.PAA294...mm.com>... (...) decorated (...) unavailable (...) errors (...) My comments: If an OMR submission is not complete i.e. elements are missing, (even these are decorated elements, minifig (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: IMPORTANT - [ldraw.org] Help Still Needed
|
|
Tim Courtney schrieb: (...) if you like, I can also format my L2P/LGEO Tutorial to be included to ldraw.org. (...) I'll do what I can. But even as a student, i have a summer course, I have a job, and I have LGEO which eats a lot of my time, along (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) Though convenient for us, inconvenient for them. As I noted it could discourage immediate submissions, which would help the Repository. But on the other hand it would be good for people to note their own errors - especially for us, so we don't (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
(...) submitting to the (...) sure each file (...) instructions (...) reflect movable (...) unavailable decorated (...) if unavailable (...) submit an errors (...) release of the (...) different author (...) could think (...) with the (...) have the (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | OMR Model Creation/Submission Rules
|
|
We should develop rules for official model creating and submitting to the OMR. First off, we can't expect all submissions to follow our header/filename system. The model editors will have to make sure each file follows those rules. Here are my (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
|
(...) <dennett@agate.net> (...) yet, no number (...) the part), and (...) the part, what (...) You are asking about unofficial mock-ups? They are not to be included. Only official parts count. Does this answer the question? Ryan (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
|
(...) I'm saying if a model requires a part which hasn't been made yet, no number is known for that part ('cause the number isn't imprinted on the part), and an unofficial (or mock-up) file is used as a placeholder for the part, what name should be (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | [ldraw.org] Official Model Repository Filenames/Headers
|
|
After discussing the ldraw.org Official Model Repository header and file naming system, I feel that we can come to a final resolution. A lot has been discussed on the topic, including various file naming systems and also locations within the models (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
|
(...) Yes, but that could cause problems down the road. We do try to find numbers for as many parts as possible, but sometimes the TLG part number is not available. We will have to have a system of updating the models once official numbers become (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
|
(...) number? How (...) What do you mean? If a piece gots voted in then it's official even if we don't know a number for it, correct? Ryan (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
|
(...) In this context, A/R just means picky about details in a Good Way. --Todd (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
|
(...) Is there a reason to put all the errors in one place, instead of putting a comment (or a 0 WRITE) before the plain-in-place-of-patterned line? But extras.dat is still needed. And what about part mock-ups for which there is no known part (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
