Subject:
|
Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 15 Jun 1999 19:37:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
703 times
|
| |
|
|
At 07:26 PM 6/15/99 +0000, Scott R Dennett wrote:
> > And what about part mock-ups for which there is no known part • number? How
> > would those be referenced?
> >
> > Steve
>
> What do you mean? If a piece gots voted in then it's official
> even
> if we don't know a number for it, correct?
Yes, but that could cause problems down the road. We do try to find
numbers for as many parts as possible, but sometimes the TLG part number is
not available. We will have to have a system of updating the models once
official numbers become available. I know LDAO allows this... When we
update OMR models, should it have a updated marker next to it and also
should it be mentioned in a periodical ldraw.org newsletter?
yes...an newsletter. I have been thinking this over but obviously it will
not begin until ldraw.org is live and running for a while.
-Tim Courtney
ldraw.org Project Coordinator
http://www.ldraw.org
http://www.zacktron.com
AIM: timcourtne
ICQ: 23951114
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
| (...) Is there a reason to put all the errors in one place, instead of putting a comment (or a 0 WRITE) before the plain-in-place-of-patterned line? But extras.dat is still needed. And what about part mock-ups for which there is no known part (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
