To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 163
162  |  164
Subject: 
Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Tue, 15 Jun 1999 19:26:41 GMT
Viewed: 
752 times
  
And what about part mock-ups for which there is no known part • number?  How
would those be referenced?

Steve

What do you mean? If a piece gots voted in then it's official
even
if we don't know a number for it, correct?

Ryan



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
 
(...) I'm saying if a model requires a part which hasn't been made yet, no number is known for that part ('cause the number isn't imprinted on the part), and an unofficial (or mock-up) file is used as a placeholder for the part, what name should be (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
 
(...) Is there a reason to put all the errors in one place, instead of putting a comment (or a 0 WRITE) before the plain-in-place-of-patterned line? But extras.dat is still needed. And what about part mock-ups for which there is no known part (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

21 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR