To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldrawOpen lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 153
152  |  154
Subject: 
Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date: 
Tue, 15 Jun 1999 16:46:39 GMT
Viewed: 
878 times
  
At 04:48 PM 6/15/99 +0000, Todd Lehman wrote:
Then we should put an errors.txt file in the MPD's to denote each
discrepancy in the official models.  Especially since a lot of the
decorated or sticker elements have not been modeled in LDraw yet.

That sounds like a really wise idea...and positively A/R, which is a Good
Thing too.  :-)

A/R??

And not only that (but related), there probably is a good reason to have an
extras.dat file to codify the extra elements that come with a set (things
like extra 1x1 round plates, extra visors, extra skeleton arms, etc. -- all
of these are pre-planned by TLG (except extra cloth capes and extra
stickers, which are production accidents)).

Good idea..

BTW, it's asking for trouble to allow filenames beginning with /, because a
filename beginning with / means "start at the root directory."  Leaving off
the initial / means that the filename is relative to the current working
directory, which is typically the c:\ldraw\models directory.

Ok.

Use of a leading / is a potentially dangerous security risk because someone
could make an MPD containing, say:

0 FILE /windows/win.ini
0 ha ha ha ha

and guess what that would do to someone's system if the splitter didn't
check the input carefully!

Wow!  You have pointed out something very serious.  Should there be things
in the MPD splitters to catch something like that and not allow it to write
to c:\ or c:\windows?

-Tim Courtney
ldraw.org Project Coordinator

http://www.ldraw.org
http://www.zacktron.com

AIM:   timcourtne
ICQ:   23951114



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
 
(...) each (...) of the (...) yet. (...) which is a Good (...) A/R?? (...) reason to have an (...) set (things (...) arms, etc. -- all (...) extra (...) And have you made a list of all those extra pieces, Todd? You can't expect people to do that on (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
  Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
 
Tim Courtney: (...) My MPD splitter never overwrites existing files - unless you set some flag I can't remember, so it should be safe. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (25 years ago, 17-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
 
(...) Then we should put an errors.txt file in the MPD's to denote each discrepancy in the official models. Especially since a lot of the decorated or sticker elements have not been modeled in LDraw yet. -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project Coordinator (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

21 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR