Subject:
|
Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 15 Jun 1999 17:01:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
943 times
|
| |
|
|
At 04:44 PM 6/15/99 +0000, John VanZwieten wrote:
> > Then we should put an errors.txt file in the MPD's to denote each
> > discrepancy in the official models. Especially since a lot of the
> > decorated or sticker elements have not been modeled in LDraw yet.
>
>
> Why not just an errors.dat file with lots of 0 comment lines? What would • LDLite do with a .txt file if it found it in an .mpd file?
> Maybe it doesn't care what extension is used on the file, but maybe it does?
I like this idea beter. LDAO and LDLite would pick it up and display it so
people can read it if it was an errors.dat instead of errors.txt.
-Tim Courtney
ldraw.org Project Coordinator
http://www.ldraw.org
http://www.zacktron.com
AIM: timcourtne
ICQ: 23951114
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
| (...) Is there a reason to put all the errors in one place, instead of putting a comment (or a 0 WRITE) before the plain-in-place-of-patterned line? But extras.dat is still needed. And what about part mock-ups for which there is no known part (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
| (...) Then we should put an errors.txt file in the MPD's to denote each discrepancy in the official models. Especially since a lot of the decorated or sticker elements have not been modeled in LDraw yet. -Tim Courtney ldraw.org Project Coordinator (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
