Subject:
|
Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 15 Jun 1999 22:09:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
783 times
|
| |
|
|
On 6/15/99, at 5:51 PM, blisses@worldnet.att.net wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 1999 19:26:41 GMT, "Scott R Dennett" • <dennett@agate.net>
> wrote:
>
> > > And what about part mock-ups for which there is no known part • number? How
> > > would those be referenced?
> > >
> > > Steve
> >
> > What do you mean? If a piece gots voted in then it's official
> > even
> > if we don't know a number for it, correct?
>
> I'm saying if a model requires a part which hasn't been made • yet, no number
> is known for that part ('cause the number isn't imprinted on • the part), and
> an unofficial (or mock-up) file is used as a placeholder for • the part, what
> name should be given that "part" file?
>
> Steve
You are asking about unofficial mock-ups? They are not to be
included.
Only official parts count.
Does this answer the question?
Ryan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: MPD, the OMR, and Incomplete Parts
|
| (...) I'm saying if a model requires a part which hasn't been made yet, no number is known for that part ('cause the number isn't imprinted on the part), and an unofficial (or mock-up) file is used as a placeholder for the part, what name should be (...) (25 years ago, 15-Jun-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
