 | | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) I think he's done an excellent job, I will second your nomination. -Leonard Hoffman (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Since they’ve done a decent job (IMO), I’d like to re-nominate the current members, including... Chris Dee -gyug (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Since they've done a decent job (IMO), I'd like to re-nominate the current members, including... Kevin Clague -gyug (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Since they've done a decent job (IMO), I'd like to re-nominate the current members, including... Larry Pieniazek -gyug (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Since they've done a decent job (IMO), I'd like to re-nominate the current members, including... Orion Pobursky -gyug (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Since they've done a decent job (IMO), I'd like to re-nominate the current members, starting with Tim Courtney. (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
Per the LDraw.org Bylaws, Subsection 6.03(a), the 2004 Steering Committee hereby calls for the community to nominate individuals as candidates for the 2005 Steering Committee. Please post nominations in response to this message. Nominations will be (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: The LDraw.org Contributer Agreement
|
|
(...) I think this hasn't been totally decided yet; the last I heard, SteerCo was still discussing it amongst itself. The two front-runner options are: 1. Possibly have two separate distros, one for 'compliant' and one for 'non-compliant'. The (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: The LDraw.org Contributer Agreement
|
|
(...) So far it only looks like you're blocked from uploading new parts until you do, but i guess that doesn't apply to orphan parts. -NB (20 years ago, 3-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: The LDraw.org Contributer Agreement
|
|
(...) just out of curiosity. what will happen if: * an author does NOT agree * an author does NOT reply will his/her parts be deleted from the library and do we have to recreate them? w. (20 years ago, 2-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: The LDraw.org Contributer Agreement
|
|
(...) Woot! Good work guys! -gyug (20 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | The LDraw.org Contributer Agreement
|
|
The LDraw.org Steering Committee is pleased to announce that the Jessiman family has given their consent to go forward with the LDraw.org Contributors Agreement. For those who don't remember, here is a link to the current version of the Contributor (...) (20 years ago, 31-Dec-04, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) !!
|
| |
| | Re: more detailed Status (of File) in Parts Tracker?
|
|
(...) And in the past, I believe replies have universally disagreed with your position. Just to be clear, let me restate my position: Blindly ignoring unofficial fixes to subfiles would allow the PT to certify files for release that reviewers would (...) (20 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | more detailed Status (of File) in Parts Tracker?
|
|
Happy Holidays, Y'all! :D I have brought up, in the past, a point of concern I have with the Status displayed by the Parts Tracker. I have believed, and continue to believe, that a file's Status should be calculated *independently* of whatever (...) (20 years ago, 28-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
(...) Thanks for the reminder about that! I always forget. Still, a quick "ya we're discussing it" followed by a "what do people think" here doesn't hurt. (20 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
(...) The LSC mailing list archives are public and a link to them can be found here: (URL) we're not completely out in the open (i.e. discussing policy on Lugnet), our discussions are available for any one who wants to follow along. -Orion (20 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
(...) Hopefully the latter. I did not intend to have any condescending tone in there at all! I'm talking about appropriate process. If you read it in there I must not have done a very good job of communicating and I apologise. Either that or you're (...) (20 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
(...) Actually your (and any other non-LSC member's) input is not wothless and actually has a great influence on what decides. We decided when the LSC first formed that we wouldn't do anything without at least discussing the pros and cons with the (...) (20 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
(...) Yeah, I got the blinking error message in preview and still posted it. I couldn't figure out the problem. Sorry, It must be the .bmp thing. I didn't think of that because they were only 8k apiece, but I can see why you'd want to avoid the (...) (20 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Don Heyse wrote: (switched to plain text for clarity) Don, I don't think your FTX image embed worked. Did it work when you used preview (you DID use preview, I am sure)? If it did, there's a technical problem somewhere... (...) (20 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
