Results 2381 – 2400 of about 7000.
|
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: ldraw.org's MOTM & SOTM for November
|
| I think the new scheme looks great! Having the contestants up for a prolonged period makes the site more worth visiting at all times. Besides, seeing the wide variety of contestants probably makes it more encouraging for newbies to submit their (...) (23 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 1.152)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.152)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.152)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.152)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.152)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.152)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.152)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.152)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.152)
|
|
| | Re: A comprehensive LDraw object model
|
| (...) > (Maybe not too much, let's keep it lean and mean.) At the least, I > think we should make the object model workable in C++, Java, Perl and > Python. (...) This is interesting. I wonder what we can do as far as making it both comprehensive (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.152)
|
|
| | Re: A comprehensive LDraw object model
|
| (...) Actually this brings up a different issue. I haven't put alot of thought into it yet, but I think it would be useful to add information in the part files that would allow a program to differentiate between geometry that represents 'outside' (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.152)
|
|
| | Re: A comprehensive LDraw object model
|
| (...) I'll have a better answer for this when I port my Java implementation to Perl. But yah, I guess "comprehensive" and "generic" don't quite mix well. I want comprehensive, in that this library could be used for many different methods of (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.152)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Tutorials - What to include
|
| Hi all, For the RNDR 101 and CONV 101 should I include some basic POV-Ray editing (colours, background, turning lights in to shadowless lights) or is that more a RNDR201 thing? And can we have a lugnet.cad.tutorial group? or is that a bit too much? (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.152)
|
|
| | Re: A comprehensive LDraw object model
|
| (...) I can definately see the benefits of a standard library interface. Even an implementation might have a lot of uses. I just think that you will get the best design for the interface, if you forget about how you or anyone implemented it in the (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.152)
|
|
| | Re: A comprehensive LDraw object model
|
| (...) Yes, What you're describing does sound like BFC to me. As someone else (travis I think?) said, BFC is a useful optimiziation for reducing the number of surfaces that need to be drawn. But it's not the same thing I was talking about. BFC (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.152)
|
|
| | Re: A comprehensive LDraw object model
|
| (...) A couple of different approaches to this have been discussed before. I think the most generic solution was to implement a 0 DETAIL <level> meta-command, that would identify the detail-level of the following lines. A 0 detail level indicates (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.152)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Tutorials - Categorization, Storage, Indexing, etc...
|
| (...) I agree on PDF: it is small, searchable (you can even create an index of multiple PDF-files which you can search), multi-platform, you can add links, bookmarks, wadda ye want more? Second choice would be html... Well, I'm going back to do my (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.152)
|
|
| | Re: A comprehensive LDraw object model
|
| (...) Well again BFC is only useful for culling surfaces that face away from you. It doesn't really do anything for faces that face you but are blocked by other faces. When I talked about top, left, right, etc, I was envisioning some system by which (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.152)
|
|
| | Re: A comprehensive LDraw object model
|
| (...) Could you give us an example? By looking at what you've written, I don't understand if one needs an ending tag, or not, to complete the '0 DETAIL' command. Where in the text of the file would this go? How would it look? Thanks a lot. Much (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.152)
|
|
| | Re: A comprehensive LDraw object model
|
| (...) I'm hoping within a couple of month or so (beta with a month or so), but it really depends on how this project goes, and the schedules of anyone who wants to contribute. (...) That shattering sound you just heard was my jaw hitting the floor. (...) (23 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 1.152)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
