CAD Development : Search Results: Stickers in LDraw


CAD / Development / Search Results: Stickers in LDraw

Results 2221 – 2240 of about 7000.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) I for one certainly don't doubt your devotion to the hobby, nor do I doubt that you will do anything but behave with the utmost integrity as a member of the committee. However, despite this it does concern me that there is nonetheless a (...) (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws - new proposed clauses
(...) After giving some thought to this - I can't think of alternate wording that would really do the issue justice, and not end up unnecessarily lengthy and awkward. If we start looking for CoI under every rock, I think that's taking it too far. My (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		gmax
Is there a file format that an Ldraw file can be rendered to that can be read into GMAX. The GMAX import option lists: AutoCad DXF 3d studio project files (.prj) 3d studio Shp (shape file) The reason I ask is if you can bet a rendered model into (...) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) I see. I wasn't clear on what role the LSC has. I've gone back over the posts dealing with that subject and understand it better now. Nevertheless, I still think it was a valid question. (...) Not really. It's less to do with the way I worded (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) I agree. (...) I suggested nothing. I was merely asking a question. Can you just answer it without reading motives into it that don't exist? Is it really necessary to be a member of the steering committee in order for suggestions on the (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) I agree with this. It's a tough issue, but people working for Lego (in any capacity) will tend do things, say things, or NOT say things to keep that paycheck coming. If more bad decisions like the color change force Lego into bankrupcy, or (...) (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws - new proposed clauses
(...) I don't think we could list which companies to watch out for, and which not to, and be comprehensive. That's why there's a general removal clause in 6.04 to enable the members to remove a SteerCo member in cases of documented, serious (...) (21 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		Re: [request] filter for PT queue
(...) Please take a look now. There is a new link on the top of the File Queue page, named "User List". (URL) restricts the list to those files for which the currently logged-in user has not submitted a review. Only reviews since the part was last (...) (21 years ago, 14-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.343)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) Thanks for your confidence. Based on my experience in the company so far, working relationships I have with Community Development people, and experience in the hobby in general, I do not believe the pressure you hypothesize about is likely to (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)

ldraw
(score: 0.342)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) My second reply to this post - this time I'm addressing the issue from a personal perspective, rather than the less partial process-oriented viewpoint in my previous post. I am concerned that a blanket provision to ban TLC employees will (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)

ldraw
(score: 0.342)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) I wouldn't expect that to conflict with any responsibilities you might get on the LDraw.org board. (...) Agreed. But it seemed - from Willy's message - like we might run into trouble with the views of a majority of the European LEGO fans using (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.342)

		Re: gmax
(...) You can use DAT2DXF or 3DWin found here: (URL) (21 years ago, 12-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.342)

		Re: Adding part updates
(...) I don't have access to a Mac, so I can't say anything with certainty, but I've used the Unix version of unzip (which I'm guessing is the one from Fink above, only compiled for a different *nix flavor). I would expect the above to extract the (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)

ldraw
(score: 0.342)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) Hi Allister - Thanks for that clarification. Actually, I was at a momentary loss for how to approach the answer, but now after thinking it through I have something to say. I would hope that whoever is elected to the Steering Committee would (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)

ldraw
(score: 0.342)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) it’s not the point if Tim has/has not a conflict of interest or is/is not eligible to be a Steering Committee Officer. I posted the comment just to show that the membership of LEGO employees in fan clubs is an issue and it has to be solved (...) (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.342)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) This is the best I can come up with: Any person who works in a retail outlet (including kiosks, mall stores, and theme park centers) from the store manager position down or any worker in manufacturing, shipping, or goundskeeping/housekeeping (...) (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.342)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) Ok, but at what point does a conflict of interect exist? Do we really need to exclude every worker simply because membership from a small subset poses a conflict of interest? -Orion (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.342)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) Apologies for not making the timeframe - they're just about ready and they should be ready to go tomorrow. -Tim (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.342)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) I strongly object to a blanket exclusion. I do not believe every position would pose a conflict of interest. Here is a thought: What about instead of having an exclusionary clause, require that if someone is employed by TLC, there be (...) (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 0.342)

		Re: LDRAWPREDIRS LDRAWPOSTDIRS - additional search paths
(...) Perhaps the delimiter character needs to be platform dependent? I realize that's not an ideal solution for programs. But I don't think people will be shipping LDraw search path settings between OS's, so it would be alright for users. I don't (...) (21 years ago, 13-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 0.342)

More: Next Page >>