|
| | Re: Internationalization of the part library?
|
| (...) I don't think it is really the task of the LSC to define a standard for internationalization (i18n) of part names, but here is a sketch of how I believe it should be handled: + The names found in LDraw files (parts and models) are considered (...) (20 years ago, 28-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.384) |
|
| | Re: Internationalization of the part library?
|
| (...) From a technical perspective I agree with Larry that the part number looks like the best key, and that the current part name is just one instance of an international language set of names. If we percieve peeron and and bricklink as countries, (...) (20 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.384) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.384) |
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
| (...) Hi Jeremy! Yours was one of the names that I figured just wasn't getting through due to something silly like this. I also figured that you'd come through and approve the new agreement so that the parts you created could continue to be (...) (20 years ago, 19-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.384) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.384) |
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
| (...) On this point, the ONLY way for me to reach the widest amount of people possible is for people who read this message to spread to word. I made a conscious (and correct) decision not to massively cross post this thread to increase exposure. I (...) (20 years ago, 21-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.384) |
|
| | Re: Comments wanted: Plans for easier parts authoring
|
| (...) Hi Stefan, While I think my opinion on this is well known, I'll answer your call for responses here.. I agree that AFOL don't "need" high-end tools for parts-authoring.. Any way to incorporate a graphical interface into the process would be a (...) (20 years ago, 6-Mar-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.384) |
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
| (...) I second this. For some reason, Lugnet isn't using my updated email address in my new posts. (Here's a hint: SPROAT.US is gone, SPROAT.NET works.) The ONLY reason I even knew of this thread is because I went ego-surfing on Lugnet today. (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.384) |
|
| | Comments wanted: Plans for easier parts authoring
|
| As some of you might have seen, I have been doing some programming lately to convert various 3D file formats to DAT format. This resulted in the MAX2DAT converter, which is useful but does not handle primitives, and is limited to the file formats (...) (20 years ago, 5-Mar-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.384) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.384) |
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
| (...) Now I'm confused. How do you post if the email is invalid? Confirmation email for every post goes to the email address attached to the (possibly spam-blocked) email you list in each post. If the address isn't valid, you don't get the (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.383) |
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Contributer Agreement Status
|
| (...) For all the asterisked people, yes. This is how I found the bulk majority of the people whose email was unknown. Also, some of the people on the list are still posting here on Lugnet but for whatever reason have not contacted me. This is why I (...) (20 years ago, 18-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.383) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.383) |
|
| | Re: Internationalization of the part library?
|
| (...) And Lego may change the number of that 2x2 from 3003 to 53456343, but it'd still be a 3003 to us, right? (...) Yes, true. (...) LDraw numbers are designed to be unambiguous. And that unambiguity is enforced by the fact that we store our data (...) (20 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
| ldraw (score: 0.383) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.383) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.383) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.383) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.383) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.383) |
|
|
| ldraw (score: 0.383) |