Subject:
|
Re: Internationalization of the part library?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 1 Mar 2005 10:44:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1815 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Steve Bliss wrote:
> > > > Willy Tschager wrote:
> > > > > could you please work out a standard for the
> > > > > internationalization of the part names.
> > > I feel it falls more to the LSC than any other group
> > > currently in existence. Although, the SteerCo could
> > > appoint a new i18n group...
> > Personally I think this is well within the pervue of the
> > LSC. I see no need for another organization.
>
> Personally, I agree.
It seems like there is general agreement that it would be a
good idea, if the LSC creates a standard for i18n in LDraw
parts names, so I will post a proposal to the LSC ASAP.
Play well,
Jacob
--
Noir comme le diable
Chaud comme l'enfer
Pur comme un ange,
Doux comme l'amour.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Internationalization of the part library?
|
| (...) Thanks! Looking forward to it! I sort of don't follow the subtlety of the issue with lookup (GNU gettext?), but it seems to me from the outside that the part number ought to be the lookup key rather than one version of the part name. At least, (...) (20 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Internationalization of the part library?
|
| (...) Personally, I agree. That said, if the LSC decided that internationalization is not a goal then some consideration of how to proceed would be needed, but I would tend to want to follow their recommendation, it's their charter to own decisions (...) (20 years ago, 28-Feb-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
