Subject:
|
Re: Internationalization of the part library?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 1 Mar 2005 17:51:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1833 times
|
| |
|
|
Anders Isaksson wrote:
> Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> But the existing part names are the unique identifier *we*
> have control over.
Exactly.
> There's also the value of at least a default text when the
> translation file is older than the part library.
Yes.
> > part numbers are designed to be unambiguous,
>
> As unambigous as set numbers? Why do you trust Lego not to
> reuse the number of an old part that they will *never*
> produce again?
I wouldn't. But we would have to work around that problem
anyway.
> The names are ours. We can make the totally unambigous if
> we need to.
Exactly.
Play well,
Jacob
--
»Men I må godt være smukke imens
vi falder for jeres intelligens.«
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Internationalization of the part library?
|
| (...) But the existing part names are the unique identifier *we* have control over. Lego may well start calling a 'Brick 2x2' 'OleKirk347' in the next version of the moulds, but it's still a 'Brick 2x2', right? There's also the value of at least a (...) (20 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
