|
 | | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
| (...) probably (...) save model (...) features (...) marking a (...) free the (...) I agree that a whole new newsgroup would be best, but I was just trying to point out that it would probably work. Not a big deal either way as far as I am concerned. (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|  
stickers, ldraw
(score: 0.429)
|
|
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
| (...) cad.dat.models.omr) will (...) and it will also (...) authors include (...) search multiple (...) would be better (...) what is a (...) pick up a (...) and get the (...) need flamewars (...) Like Todd said, I think 'OMR SUBMISSION set XXXX' (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
stickers, ldraw
(score: 0.429)
|
|
| | Re: Questions on Stickers and Certification
|
| Tore Eriksson wrote: > In some cases, like attached to rounded surfaces, I think the only way is to > solve the problem is to create a part-with-sticker file. > I hadn't thought about applying stickers to rounded parts. I know there is a lot of (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
stickers
(score: 0.429)
|
|
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
| (...) Though 'OMR' would denote a submission to the OMR, etc, it would be better to have a separate group so there is absolutely no question what is a submission and what is not. All we need is for an editor to pick up a non-submitted model that (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
stickers, ldraw
(score: 0.429)
|
|
| | Re: OMR Submission and Storage
|
| Tim Courtney <tim@zacktron.com> wrote in message news:4.2.0.58.199907...omm.com... (...) We might as well use models.sets for this, and just have authors include "OMR" in the subject header. This will avoid the confusion that would come with two (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
stickers, ldraw
(score: 0.429)
|
|
| | Re: Questions on Stickers and Certification
|
| (...) I think this is an important point. Subfiles are *very* useful tools for modeling parts, but we should use them with restraint. I will frequently model a part using multiple subfiles, but then I will inline all the code into a single file (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
stickers
(score: 0.429)
|
|
| | Re: Questions on Stickers and Certification
|
| Hello! (...) still (...) says (...) I agree to the point too.... we need more reviewers. There are like 5 parts in the line I did... and they are there for a long time. That isn't very satisfying. I know a lot of authors who are waiting for their (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
stickers
(score: 0.429)
|
|
| | OMR Submission and Storage
|
| I feel that we should wrap up plans on OMR submission and storage so we can get the structure in place to begin accepting models on the OMR itself. First off, PLEASE DO NOT email me your submissions to the OMR. As of now I am not officially (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
stickers, ldraw
(score: 0.429)
|
|
| | Re: Questions on Stickers and Certification
|
| (...) I agree that authors should not be allowed to self-certify, but ONLY if we get sufficient active reviewers to keep things moving. The last three updates would have been much smaller without self-certification. Some new reviewers have become (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
stickers
(score: 0.428)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.428)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.427)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.427)
|
|
| | Re: Bricksmith 1.3: Here's Looking at You, Kid
|
| (...) For what it's worth, I don't think most people are aware that OpenGL can be used to render images at arbitrary resolutions. Most video cards don't support rendering directly above 2048x2048. (Presumably the new cards that support 2560x1600 (...) (19 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.426)
|
|
| | Re: Bricksmith 1.3: Here's Looking at You, Kid
|
| (...) Okay, that puts me in my place. I hereby recant any prior suggestions about crummy resolution! Now that we have established that OpenGL can produce print-quality images, my question is: Can OpenGL produce instruction-quality graphics? Even (...) (19 years ago, 4-Apr-06, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.426)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.425)
|
|
| | Stickers (Was: x740 Minifig Vest)
|
| Terry K <legoverse@geocities.com> wrote in message news:377c79d9.335312...net.com... (...) update (...) how (...) be (...) the (...) as (...) I think we should allow stickers. Granted they won't look spectacular in LDraw or LDLite right now, but (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
stickers, ldraw
(score: 0.425)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.425)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.425)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.425)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.425)
|
