Subject:
|
Re: Questions on Stickers and Certification
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 22 Feb 2002 13:13:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
733 times
|
| |
|
|
Hello!
> I agree that authors should not be allowed to self-certify, but ONLY if we
> get sufficient active reviewers to keep things moving. The last three
> updates would have been much smaller without self-certification. Some new
> reviewers have become active recently but I get the feeling there are • still
> less reviewers that there were voters under the old method. Maybe that • says
> more about problems with the old system than the new.
I agree to the point too.... we need more reviewers. There are like 5 parts
in the line I did...
and they are there for a long time. That isn't very satisfying. I know a lot
of authors who are waiting for their parts to get them reviewed and finally
released. That was the reason why i was reviewing mostly completely
unreviewed parts in the first line so the authors get at least a first
feedback ... that improves
motivation.
I see too that a few reviewers are scared of parts with subparts. But just
these parts are really important to review and get on their way ...and for
people who made a complicated part its not very motivating to wait for a
year to get a parts released. At least that doesnt encourage them to make
more parts.
> As an experiment, I'll nullify my current self-certifications.
I dont think that will make it easier ;).
Play well
Carsten
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Questions on Stickers and Certification
|
| (...) I think this is an important point. Subfiles are *very* useful tools for modeling parts, but we should use them with restraint. I will frequently model a part using multiple subfiles, but then I will inline all the code into a single file (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Questions on Stickers and Certification
|
| (...) I agree that authors should not be allowed to self-certify, but ONLY if we get sufficient active reviewers to keep things moving. The last three updates would have been much smaller without self-certification. Some new reviewers have become (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
