To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 6937
6936  |  6938
Subject: 
Re: Questions on Stickers and Certification
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Fri, 22 Feb 2002 08:24:19 GMT
Viewed: 
911 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Tony Hafner writes:
On stickers:

Should stickers be treated, for part authoring purposes, as if they were
printed on the parts?  If so, should we indicate somehow that the part is
stickered as opposed to printed?

I'm currently working on modelling of the stickers of the Technic black
Supercar. Before that I put some question in thread
http://news.lugnet.com/news/display.cgi?lugnet.cad.dev:6715

Then we agreed on the approach that stickers are separate parts just as they
were ordinary bricks since, they can be sticked on various parts, as
alternate models in Technic sets usually require. So they differ from
patterns that are unremovably printed on parts.

In some cases the number of the sticker sheet is known and the sticker part
will get this number as LDraw filename suffixed be some subpart identifier
xxxxxxa.dat, xxxxxxb.dat etc.

Please have a look at my sticker renderings at
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=11384

And on certification (on LDraw.org's parts tracker):

I've noticed that some parts are reviewed and certified by the author.  Is
this okay, or should we only certify parts done by others?

My opinion is that we souldn't allow the 'self-certification' of the parts
by their author. I'm sure that everybody carefully checks his or her part
before submission, but the author might not notice some errors that others
could. This is the way of working of the human brain. We get better quality
parts if more independent reviewers have chance to check them.

Ampi

----------------------------------------
         Imre Papp
Geometria GIS Systems House
  email: ipapp@geometria.hu
    web: www.geometria.hu
----------------------------------------



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Questions on Stickers and Certification
 
(...) I agree that authors should not be allowed to self-certify, but ONLY if we get sufficient active reviewers to keep things moving. The last three updates would have been much smaller without self-certification. Some new reviewers have become (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
  More on Stickers (was: Questions on Stickers and Certification)
 
(...) From reading that thread, it sounds like the only reasonably solution to both the bleed and seam gap problems is to author the parts and stickers together. Problems with stickers as separate parts: Nomenclature: - 6 digits for the sheet ID (...) (23 years ago, 22-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Questions on Stickers and Certification
 
On stickers: Should stickers be treated, for part authoring purposes, as if they were printed on the parts? If so, should we indicate somehow that the part is stickered as opposed to printed? And on certification (on LDraw.org's parts tracker): I've (...) (23 years ago, 21-Feb-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)

17 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR