To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 8683
8682  |  8684
Subject: 
Re: Embedded language support in LPub
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:26:57 GMT
Viewed: 
638 times
  
On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 05:16:53PM +0000, Mike Walsh wrote:
it's true that Tcl is probably easier to read and support, over the
phone.  Perl is more powerful, and therefor harder to understand what a
user is trying to do in his code.

Not just over the phone, live and in person as well.  More powerful does not
always mean something s better.  Perl allows people to do a lot of
processing in a very compact syntax.  That can be a good thing or a bad
thing.  The usage of some of Perl's compact syntax can result in code that
is very hard to understand - sometimes even for the author if they haven't
looked at it in a while.  Of course well commented code usually alleviates
these types of problems but it is hard to depend on users to comment their
code well.

I believe you can write unreadable code in any language - perl perhaps
makes it easy for you, but it also lets you write extreamly readable
readable code - just a matter of style.

[snip]

Imagine a 7th grade class being introduced to ML-CAD and related L-Draw
tools for a LEGO based computer project?  Is that audience better served
with a language like Perl or Tcl?  Is a 7th grade class even a target
audience?

I don't know - that's up to Kevin to decide.  I think once an API is
written, it's not up to the author to teach how to code in the language
chosen.  If it's a Tcl API, you should know Tcl.  If it's a perl API,
knowledge of perl is assumed.

Which, btw, brings up another point - I don't have statistics, but I
think the perl userbase is much larger, meaning a higher percentage of
users would be able to use it.  I may be mistaken though.

:)

--
Dan Boger
dan@peeron.com



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Embedded language support in LPub
 
(...) That could be another LDraw.org web poll, or a LUGNET poll... -Tim (21 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
  Re: Embedded language support in LPub
 
"Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:20030408192657....ron.com... (...) [ ... snipped ... ] (...) [ ... snipped ... ] This would be an interesting statistic to know. I wonder how one might find this out. Somewhere on the web there has (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Embedded language support in LPub
 
"Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:20030408155024....ron.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) Not just over the phone, live and in person as well. More powerful does not always mean something s better. Perl allows people to do a lot of (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

31 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR