Subject:
|
Re: Embedded language support in LPub
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 8 Apr 2003 17:16:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
624 times
|
| |
|
|
"Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message
news:20030408155024.GC15747@peeron.com...
[ ... snipped ... ]
>
> it's true that Tcl is probably easier to read and support, over the
> phone. Perl is more powerful, and therefor harder to understand what a
> user is trying to do in his code.
Not just over the phone, live and in person as well. More powerful does not
always mean something s better. Perl allows people to do a lot of
processing in a very compact syntax. That can be a good thing or a bad
thing. The usage of some of Perl's compact syntax can result in code that
is very hard to understand - sometimes even for the author if they haven't
looked at it in a while. Of course well commented code usually alleviates
these types of problems but it is hard to depend on users to comment their
code well.
>
> I'm not sure this would be an issue for LPub though.
[ ... snipped ... ]
I am curious as to why this might not be an issue for LPub? With Kevin's
book on the shelves of bookstores (at least I assume it is), there is likely
to be a community of people who are not LUGNET users nor are they hard core
computer users who will be introduced to LPub and all of the other L-Draw
related tools.
I would think the last thing Kevin would want is to start receiving lots of
e-mail on how to this and how to do that with LPub. With a fairly small and
what appears to be a highly computer literate user base, LPub can currently
assume a certain level of savy. I don't think that will always be the case.
LPub has already made it possible for a lot of people to create very nice
instructions quickly who previously didn't have the patience or possibly the
know how to work through the tedious instruction building process.
Imagine a 7th grade class being introduced to ML-CAD and related L-Draw
tools for a LEGO based computer project? Is that audience better served
with a language like Perl or Tcl? Is a 7th grade class even a target
audience?
Another $0.02 from me - now I am up to $0.04 as well! ;-)
Mike
--
Mike Walsh - mike_walsh at mindspring.com
http://www.ncltc.cc - North Carolina LEGO Train Club
http://www.carolinatrainbuilders.com - Carolina Train Builders
http://www.bricklink.com/store.asp?p=mpw - CTB/Brick Depot
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Embedded language support in LPub
|
| (...) I believe you can write unreadable code in any language - perl perhaps makes it easy for you, but it also lets you write extreamly readable readable code - just a matter of style. [snip] (...) I don't know - that's up to Kevin to decide. I (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Re: Embedded language support in LPub
|
| (...) I want to make one thing clear.... The embedded scripting is for the power users... As power users develop new ideas I will encorporate them into LPub in a way that the novice does not require the novice to be an expert. LPub is powerful, yet (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Embedded language support in LPub
|
| (...) it's true that Tcl is probably easier to read and support, over the phone. Perl is more powerful, and therefor harder to understand what a user is trying to do in his code. I'm not sure this would be an issue for LPub though. [snip] (...) perl (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
31 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
