Subject:
|
Re: Formalizing a method for handling synthesizable parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 17 Sep 2002 16:09:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
561 times
|
| |
|
|
Thanks for this pointer. I contacted Koen and he has gaciously donated his
code to the synthesis effort.
The results on his website are stunning. Going straight to triangles provides
a much more finished looking result.
This will work very well for eveything except for the ribbed hoses. The
executable looks extremely huge, so I'm hoping I can cut it down to a minimum.
Bendie thing may sound funny, but actually bendable is possibly a better name
than flexible. Mini-figs are flexible, but not meant to bend.
Kevin
In lugnet.cad.dev, Dave Schuler writes:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, John Gerlach writes:
> > In lugnet.cad.dev, Dave Schuler writes:
> > >
> > > This?
> > >
> > > http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/?n=5513
> > >
> > > Dave!
> >
> > Yes! That's the one!
> >
> > Good to know my memory hasn't *completely* gone soft in my old age...
>
> I suspect your problem was that you were confused by the technical jargon
> of "Bend Thingie." 8^)
>
> Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
37 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
