To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 7931
7930  |  7932
Subject: 
Re: Formalizing a method for handling synthesizable parts
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Sun, 6 Oct 2002 12:53:26 GMT
Viewed: 
492 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Kevin Clague writes:
Philo,

Boy, were you right, the triangle synthesis took a 3K file and made a 2M
file.  Unpalatable.

I switched lsynth over to use LDRAW parts for synthesis.  Now that 3K file
ends up to be 500K, still much larger, but certainly better than before.

If you are going to go the subpart route, have you considered making an
option to subpart the flexible object in a separate file so that seam width
shrink is avoided when using L3P (or others) ?

-Orion



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Formalizing a method for handling synthesizable parts
 
Orion, I had not thought about this. This is consistant with Steve Bliss' concern about putting out the synthesized parts in a seperate file so that they can be cosidered one part by other LDRAW compatible programs. I can see two issues here. The (...) (22 years ago, 6-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Formalizing a method for handling synthesizable parts
 
Philo, Boy, were you right, the triangle synthesis took a 3K file and made a 2M file. Unpalatable. I switched lsynth over to use LDRAW parts for synthesis. Now that 3K file ends up to be 500K, still much larger, but certainly better than before. (...) (22 years ago, 6-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)

37 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR