Subject:
|
Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 14 Sep 2000 02:59:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
859 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:G0sn7p.M08@lugnet.com...
> > There is someting else I like to say about maintaning part quality, (and I
> > hope I do not hurt anyone's feelings doing so) I get the impression that in
> > the past not all voters have judged parts carefully, and failed (or ignored)
> > to see errors that are visable when you examine a part closly from other
> > angles than the standard view. The strange thing was that all those parts
> > simply made it through the votes. In fact, this made me giving up vote
> > participation. It didn't seem to be worth all the trouble I've put into it.
>
> You are absolutely right, the voting process rarely turns away files. That's
> why I want to stop having part-votes, and implement a process of peer-review.
This sounds like an interesting idea. I'd like to hear more.
Adam
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work
|
| (...) Basically, the idea is that each new partfile would be carefully reviewed by a small number of people (between 1 and 3 reviewers per file, I think). Once the reviewers and the author agreed on the part, it would be released. As soon as I can, (...) (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work
|
| (...) I've been working on another one. The particular part I've been looking at was released in mid-1998, and it seems apparent that the tools available at the time had a big impact on the ability of the author to be thorough in modeling. Once the (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
