Subject:
|
Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 7 Sep 2000 23:02:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
549 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Adam Howard writes:
> We need to set some kind of time limit for parts that 'Need Work'.
I don't think that a time limit would work. What would we do, delete the
files if time expires?
> I was looking through the parts list and found one that was in a 97 update.
> And it still needs work. The flower parts are another example. When will
> these 'Needs Work' parts be updated?
If they're the parts I'm thinking of, you're going to have a hard time getting
the Original Author to work on them.
> I think we should change our policy on 'Needs Work' parts.
That might be very true.
The entire parts-approval process is going to change. I think the "Needs
Work" tag will become an item of negotiation. If a part has some visible
deficiency, the author will have to show that the problem is very hard to
resolve. Otherwise, they'll just have to fix the issue.
Also, we should add comments to the file, describing what it is that "needs
work".
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work
|
| (...) Not sure... I do not think that deleting them is the answer. (...) Is there a way we could put these parts on a html "page" somewhere for current parts authors to offer to fix them? (...) Sounds good! Paul (24 years ago, 8-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | "Needs Work"- Needs Work
|
| We need to set some kind of time limit for parts that 'Need Work'. I was looking through the parts list and found one that was in a 97 update. And it still needs work. The flower parts are another example. When will these 'Needs Work' parts be (...) (24 years ago, 7-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
