Subject:
|
Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 20:43:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
688 times
|
| |
|
|
Manfred Moolhuysen wrote:
>
> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I can't recall that a part ever was
> rejected as a result of a vote, ever since I've joined Lugnet and his
> predecessor (the Lcad-list, wasn't it)
IIRC, several parts were rejected in one of the votes but that was the
only time. Don't you remember the endless discussion about people being
allowed to model parts that they don't have ?
Leonardo
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work
|
| (...) Yes, but according to my, possibly unreliable recollection, those parts where rejected or withdrawn before voting (during submission time), or as a result of the discussion, but not as a result of a actual vote. And regardless why, like you've (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work
|
| I would like to bring under your attention that in the past year some "Needs Work" parts actualy have been fixed by authors other than original ones. And recently myself and other people did review some parts that didn't have the "Needs Work"-tag on (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
