 | | "Needs Work"- Needs Work —Adam Howard
|
| | | We need to set some kind of time limit for parts that 'Need Work'. I was looking through the parts list and found one that was in a 97 update. And it still needs work. The flower parts are another example. When will these 'Needs Work' parts be (...) (24 years ago, 7-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) I don't think that a time limit would work. What would we do, delete the files if time expires? (...) If they're the parts I'm thinking of, you're going to have a hard time getting the Original Author to work on them. (...) That might be very (...) (24 years ago, 7-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work —Paul Easter
|
| | | | (...) Not sure... I do not think that deleting them is the answer. (...) Is there a way we could put these parts on a html "page" somewhere for current parts authors to offer to fix them? (...) Sounds good! Paul (24 years ago, 8-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | (...) Hmm. I've been thinking about various things that need attention in the parts library, and how those things could be publicized. A "Things You Could Do" page might be a good thing. Then again, it could easily turn into an ever-growing laundry (...) (24 years ago, 8-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work —Chris Dee
|
| | | | | | | (...) current (...) Do you have a breakdown of "Needs work" parts, split between "active" authors and "non-active" authors, or even just categorised by author? Might help to identify which parts we have a realistic chance of getting completed by the (...) (24 years ago, 8-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | | "Chris Dee" <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:G0Kq01.MKC@lugnet.com... (...) authors (...) to (...) the (...) What do you all think of a page like: (URL) resources could be gathered for parts and some sort of permanent parts tracker (...) (24 years ago, 8-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work —Chris Dee
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I get the same _Couldn't find the resource_ error with this URL as I do with (URL) Are you sure there is public access below www.ldraw.org/dev ? Chris (24 years ago, 8-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | | "Chris Dee" <chris_w_dee@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:G0LAn3.KJt@lugnet.com... (...) with (...) below (...) No, I'm not sure....there probably isn't. But nothing there exists yet - that's all just made up URLs....the only place that does exist (...) (24 years ago, 8-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work —Chris Dee
|
| | | | | | | | (...) So is the hyperlink to Tom Burger's Reference Materials on (URL) a phantom link also? Chris (24 years ago, 8-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work —Thomas Burger
|
| | | | | | | | (...) yes it is a false link , tim never published the stuff i sent him (24 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | | "Thomas Burger" <Tburger666@aol.com> wrote in message news:G13G5x.3yn@lugnet.com... (...) The reason I didn't publish it was because I was waiting for it to be corrected gramatically. Since I'm not a parts author, I wouldn't be comfortable doing it (...) (24 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work —Chris Dee
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I am happy to incorporate / edit the existing text, and now I can see (URL) and the pages it links to, but these are some missing HTML end tags. Internet Explorer (4.0) can cope with these, but Netscape (4.08) cannot and just displays the raw (...) (24 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Fanzine- CAD Page? (was Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work) —Alex Farlie
|
| | | | | | (...) current (...) A feature of the fan-zine CAD page perhaps? If anyone was willing to write one? Other, items could include: Tool reviews and comparisons. How to - tutorials... MOC's in the CAD system- (Although I supsect most of the artwork for (...) (24 years ago, 9-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work —Manfred Moolhuysen
|
| | | | I would like to bring under your attention that in the past year some "Needs Work" parts actualy have been fixed by authors other than original ones. And recently myself and other people did review some parts that didn't have the "Needs Work"-tag on (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work —Leonardo Zide
|
| | | | | (...) IIRC, several parts were rejected in one of the votes but that was the only time. Don't you remember the endless discussion about people being allowed to model parts that they don't have ? Leonardo (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work —Manfred Moolhuysen
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes, but according to my, possibly unreliable recollection, those parts where rejected or withdrawn before voting (during submission time), or as a result of the discussion, but not as a result of a actual vote. And regardless why, like you've (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) I've been working on another one. The particular part I've been looking at was released in mid-1998, and it seems apparent that the tools available at the time had a big impact on the ability of the author to be thorough in modeling. Once the (...) (24 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work —Adam Howard
|
| | | | Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:G0sn7p.M08@lugnet.com... (...) This sounds like an interesting idea. I'd like to hear more. Adam (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Basically, the idea is that each new partfile would be carefully reviewed by a small number of people (between 1 and 3 reviewers per file, I think). Once the reviewers and the author agreed on the part, it would be released. As soon as I can, (...) (24 years ago, 14-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
