 | | Re: Gears (Was: Voting Open...)
|
|
(...) Hmm. I may be confused. The DACTA gears (see (URL)) may all be DUPLO scale. (...) About the same time as the rest of us. Once we get one standard figured out, some other issue arises. Steve (24 years ago, 23-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-02
|
|
(...) Alrighty. And truly decorative parts can still be labeled as decorative. But I'm not retro-labeling *anything*. So, should 32166.dat, Technic Connector Block 3 x 6 x 1 & 2/3 Gearbox, be renamed to Technic Gearbox 3 x 6 x 1 & 2/3 Gearbox (...) (24 years ago, 23-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | R2D2's body (Was: Voting Open...)
|
|
(...) Ditto. I suggest it should be rotated 90 degrees before officializatoin. (btw, I made a little mockup of R2's body with orna... sorry, pattern) -- Tore Eriksson Sweden ICQ: 76066510 LEGO: MOC++++ FS,SP,TO++ TC+ LS YB@m (24 years ago, 23-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Gears (Was: Voting Open...)
|
|
(...) I think I've done all except for the largest. (...) DSCTS gears? Are they the same as Classic European Pre-Technic gears? (URL) is there yet another kind? The euro gears are not at all compatible with Samsonite gears. Where can a picture of (...) (24 years ago, 23-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-02
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes: [snip] (...) O.K. Ornamented it will be then. By the way, Steve, Did you already notice that I've started to send "suggested update revisions" to your adress "partsref@worldnet.att.net" ? (24 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-02
|
|
(...) Right. As I understand, this brick appeared with several different colors of printing, but always on the same color brick. This approach (hard-coding the brick color, but allowing the pattern color to 'float') has been done in a few other (...) (24 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Stages, woo-hoo! (Was: The Artemis Project)
|
|
(...) The single greatest contribution (IMO) that the Artemis Project has to offer is the concept of Stages, its OO approach to model and submodel storage. Essentially, a model can be associated with a Stage or a set of attributes -- origin offset, (...) (24 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.publish, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-02
|
|
(...) This is by design then? (...) No preference here; I just think that (for consistency) the origin should be between two studs (if possible), and visible when the model is viewed from the front or back or the sides (if possible). This one is (...) (24 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-02
|
|
(...) I considered posting the L3P -check output as a link on the voting page. (...) How about a parrot w/o decorative printing? ;) (...) It would be very nice if L3Lab had a menu command for L3P-check'ing the current file. A little dialog to set (...) (24 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-02
|
|
(...) Note to everyone (repeating myself from just a few minutes ago): the one thing that practically *can't* be changed after a part is released is the orientation and positioning! So it may seem picayune to argue about these things, but it is very (...) (24 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-02
|
|
(...) Oh, right. Good point. (...) Right. The parts in question *are* useful, and do have some mirrors and beads on them (so to speak). (...) I feel just the opposite. "Decorated" is a common description for parts with printed patterns on them. I've (...) (24 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: www.ldraw.org unreachable
|
|
(...) (24 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Change of part-submission address
|
|
Dear Y'all: I've changed ISPs, and so the address for parts-submission has changed as well. From now on, please direct all parts submissions to: partsref@home.com That's not too hard, is it? I will continue to check the old partsref@worldnet.att.net (...) (24 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-02
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote... (...) Yes, 226 files! Thank you for your effort. (...) Well, I did - or rather L3P went nuts spitting out 1500+ lines! It seems that 63 files slipped through the Quality Control: 980 bow-ties ("Bad vertex sequence") 487 (...) (24 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: www.ldraw.org unreachable
|
|
"Michael Lachmann" <michael.lachmann@maxmobil.at> wrote in message news:FzonKr.6I6@lugnet.com... (...) use (...) lugnet.news.group@lugnet.com is the email address format each respective group. So to post here, send mail to lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com (...) (24 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: www.ldraw.org unreachable
|
|
I had similar problems a while ago, after several retries sometimes I got a response. Since the last 2 months there is no problem anymore. I can reach ldraw.org at any time. That sounds like a routing problem. Is the address of ldraw.org stable or (...) (24 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: www.ldraw.org unreachable
|
|
Yeah! Reply to your own mail... Perhaps a handy link for people (2 URLs) for that matter... Hope this helps. Greetingz... Sjaacko (...) (24 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | www.ldraw.org unreachable
|
|
Hi all, In the thread of the new voting, there are some postings of people who cannot seem to find www.ldraw.org. I have this problem all the time. In my situation it helps to do the things I suggested in my reply to Franklin W. Cain who asked: (...) (24 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-02
|
|
(...) <snipple> (...) You forgot my favorite advice about voting: "Vote early, and vote often!" ;-)[0] -Tom McD. [0] Credit given to whomever thought that up (whose name I don't know) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Open for LCAD Parts Update 2000-02
|
|
First off, lemme say wow, what a big set. I couldn't finish it in one sitting. Thanks, Steve and everyone else! :-, Secondly, I'm serious when I vote "no" due to rotation centers. If anyone disagrees with me here, let's get a discussion going (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
